AMD vs nVidia vs Intel - benchmark(s) and stuff

Rezolvarea problemelor tehnice, ultimele știri din domeniu și cele mai interesante site-uri.
User avatar
zme-ul
cel rau
Posts: 3652
Joined: 24 Mar 2014, 05:20

AMD vs nVidia vs Intel - benchmark(s) and stuff

Post by zme-ul »

人は地獄を作った
User avatar
zme-ul
cel rau
Posts: 3652
Joined: 24 Mar 2014, 05:20

Re: AMD vs nVidia vs Intel - benchmark(s) and stuff

Post by zme-ul »

人は地獄を作った
User avatar
zme-ul
cel rau
Posts: 3652
Joined: 24 Mar 2014, 05:20

Re: AMD vs nVidia vs Intel - benchmark(s) and stuff

Post by zme-ul »

人は地獄を作った
User avatar
zme-ul
cel rau
Posts: 3652
Joined: 24 Mar 2014, 05:20

Re: AMD vs nVidia vs Intel - benchmark(s) and stuff

Post by zme-ul »

Battlefield 4 Dragon's Teeth - Technology Analysis and benchmarks, DirectX 11 and Mantle

pe scurt: 2Gb VRAM pt Mantle nu e de ajuns :|


le:
chestia asta m-a facut curios, asa ca am rulat StarSwarm in DX cat si Mantle - 1080p, setari extreme

DX: 1506MB VRAM folosit
Mantle: 2152MB VRAM folosit

:shock:

nota: 280Xu cu care am testat are 3Gb VRAM
人は地獄を作った
User avatar
zme-ul
cel rau
Posts: 3652
Joined: 24 Mar 2014, 05:20

Re: AMD vs nVidia vs Intel - benchmark(s) and stuff

Post by zme-ul »

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980, GTX 970, GTX 980M and GTX 970M 3DMark performance

Image

Image

nVidia revine, dar acum depinde cat de mult costa noua serie :P
人は地獄を作った
User avatar
zme-ul
cel rau
Posts: 3652
Joined: 24 Mar 2014, 05:20

Re: AMD vs nVidia vs Intel - benchmark(s) and stuff

Post by zme-ul »

人は地獄を作った
User avatar
zme-ul
cel rau
Posts: 3652
Joined: 24 Mar 2014, 05:20

Re: AMD vs nVidia vs Intel - benchmark(s) and stuff

Post by zme-ul »

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 and GTX 970 review leaks out

Image Image

Image Image

Image Image


holy shit! GTX 980u rupe 290Xu de la AMD, acum conteaza si pretul
consumul, iarasi ... mult mai mic fata de 290X

nici GTX 970u nu e foarte departe de 290X ;)
人は地獄を作った
User avatar
zme-ul
cel rau
Posts: 3652
Joined: 24 Mar 2014, 05:20

Re: AMD vs nVidia vs Intel - benchmark(s) and stuff

Post by zme-ul »

Broadwell: Intel Core i7-5775C And i5-5675C Review

Image
Image
Image

:o Intel loveste puternic in segmenul placilor video low end
人は地獄を作った
User avatar
zme-ul
cel rau
Posts: 3652
Joined: 24 Mar 2014, 05:20

Re: AMD vs nVidia vs Intel - benchmark(s) and stuff

Post by zme-ul »

AMD a lansat oficial AMD Radeon R9 Fury X
Image
si cateva reviewuri: consensul general e ca Fury X e sub, sau cel mult la acelasi nivel, cu GTX980Ti pentru exact acelasi pret (MSRP) si un consum ceva mai mare

Image
人は地獄を作った
User avatar
zme-ul
cel rau
Posts: 3652
Joined: 24 Mar 2014, 05:20

Re: AMD vs nVidia vs Intel - benchmark(s) and stuff

Post by zme-ul »

AMD a lansat oficial R9 Fury (racite cu aer)
review: http://anandtech.com/show/9421/the-amd- ... phire-asus ASUS + Sapphire

AMD si-au cam tras un sut singuri in cur pentru ca R9 Fury e ~100$ mai ieftina decat Fury X si nu trebuie sa-ti bati capul cu racirea cu lichid
人は地獄を作った
User avatar
zme-ul
cel rau
Posts: 3652
Joined: 24 Mar 2014, 05:20

Re: AMD vs nVidia vs Intel - benchmark(s) and stuff

Post by zme-ul »

22-Way Comparison Of NVIDIA & AMD Graphics Cards On SteamOS For Steam Linux Gaming
With Steam Machines set to begin shipping next month and SteamOS beginning to interest more gamers as an alternative to Windows for building a living room gaming PC, in this article I've carried out a twenty-two graphics card comparison with various NVIDIA GeForce and AMD Radeon GPUs while testing them on the Debian Linux-based SteamOS 2.0 "Brewmaster" operating system using a variety of Steam Linux games.

As it's been almost two years since running some SteamOS graphics benchmarks, it's certainly past due for running a new comparison with SteamOS in much better shape now for public appeal. I did a fresh install of SteamOS 2.0 Brewmaster on a test system (Core i7 5960X, Gigabyte X99, 16GB DDR4 RAM, 240GB OCZ SSD) and then proceeded to load the Phoronix Test Suite on it through the GNOME 3.14 based desktop environment that's hidden behind the default Big Picture Mode.

When pulling in some extra packages from the Debian Wheezy repository, it was possible to get the Phoronix Test Suite running fine on Brewmaster for offering automated benchmarks. In addition to looking at the raw performance results, the Phoronix Test Suite was simultaneously monitoring the GPU's core temperature as well (exposed via the respective driver interfaces) as the overall AC system power draw (via a USB-based WattsUp Power meter). With the power information, the overall system power consumption was recorded for each system + graphics card as well as the factored performance-per-Watt. As another metric, there's also performance-per-dollar benchmark results for the graphics cards tested that you can still easily purchase new; the prices used were obtained from Amazon.com in the US for the particular graphics card model tested and for the reference graphics cards tested their MSRP was used.

...

The NVIDIA graphics cards tested for this SteamOS comparison included many new and old GPUs. There's every current Maxwell GPU model, several Kepler GPUs, and even some older Fermi cards for those curious how their old systems will work on SteamOS with these Linux games.
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti 1024MB
- Zotac NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 1024MB
- MSI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 1024MB
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 2048MB
- eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 1024MB
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2048MB
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 2048MB
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 3072MB
- eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2048MB
- eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2048MB
- eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4096MB
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4096MB
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6144MB
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12288MB

...

So for the AMD side I was just left:
- Sapphire AMD Radeon HD 6570 512MB
- Sapphire AMD Radeon HD 6870 1024MB
- Sapphire AMD Radeon HD 6950 2048MB
- XFX AMD Radeon HD 7950 3072MB
- XFX AMD Radeon R9 285 2048MB
- XFX AMD Radeon R9 290 4096MB
- Sapphire AMD Radeon R9 Fury 4096MB
Image
人は地獄を作った
User avatar
caleb
Pig Cop
Posts: 854
Joined: 25 Mar 2014, 17:03

Re: AMD vs nVidia vs Intel - benchmark(s) and stuff

Post by caleb »

Plus că mai e şi alt raport, performanţă vs amprentă termică. Pentru cei care şi+ar face miniITX şi contează şi asta. Unde iar Radeon, din păcate, şi-o ia urât de la seria 9xx.
User avatar
Doc
Hammer Haunt
Posts: 1778
Joined: 29 Jun 2015, 21:23

Re: AMD vs nVidia vs Intel - benchmark(s) and stuff

Post by Doc »

Hmm, sunt cam 5-6 milioane pe Emag placile de top. Foarte util graficul, chiar urmeaza sa-mi schimb placa. Mii de multumiri :)
User avatar
ola small dickie
Big Daddy
Posts: 14558
Joined: 2 Mar 2014, 19:57
Location: Malta

Re: AMD vs nVidia vs Intel - benchmark(s) and stuff

Post by ola small dickie »

GTX 750 am si eu. :) de la evga. ce inspirat am fost
Currently playing: Broken Sword 5: The Serpent's Curse
User avatar
TG
Dremora Lord
Posts: 4947
Joined: 1 Mar 2014, 20:08
Contact:

Re: AMD vs nVidia vs Intel - benchmark(s) and stuff

Post by TG »

Dacă nu folosești SteamOS, not really, în mod normal 750-ul fiind overpriced as fuck (dar potrivit ca o mănușă pentru Steam Machines). Rezultatele sunt după așteptări, AMD drivers ftw. :lol:
"Screams of a billion murdered stars give life to the night's peace. While we cling in desperation to the few spinning stones we call worlds."

Image
User avatar
ola small dickie
Big Daddy
Posts: 14558
Joined: 2 Mar 2014, 19:57
Location: Malta

Re: AMD vs nVidia vs Intel - benchmark(s) and stuff

Post by ola small dickie »

Nu ma intereseaza steamos. Am dat 550 de lei pe ea anul trecut. E overpriced? Puteam sa-mi iau alta nvidia mai buna ca pret / calitate?
Currently playing: Broken Sword 5: The Serpent's Curse
User avatar
TG
Dremora Lord
Posts: 4947
Joined: 1 Mar 2014, 20:08
Contact:

Re: AMD vs nVidia vs Intel - benchmark(s) and stuff

Post by TG »

Ideea e ca 750 e o placa video destul de slaba ca performanta, dar extrem de eficienta. Se adreseaza mai mult celor cu configuratii mai vechi sau surse slabe, 750 TI-ul e o varianta cu ceva mai mult oompf, dar din nou, ca performanta/pret nu e avantajoasa.

Depinde ce gaseai pe stoc si de unde ai cumparat. In principiu, cu 150-200 de lei in plus puteai lua un 660 GTX care era mult mai performant. Ca pret, da, e overpriced, in seriile vechi (6, 5, 4) cu 550 de lei primeai mai multa performanta relativ la jocurile de atunci. Eu de exemplu mi-am luat 460 GTX cu 650 de lei. Deci in categoria de mijloc, preturile au crescut dar nu datorita performantei, ci eficientei (consum mic).

Si eu am avut o alegere similara de facut, intre 750 Ti si altceva, am trecut pe AMD pentru ca, cu toata antipatia si problemele ce le-am avut cu ei de-a lungul vremii, diferenta de performanta era pur si simplu prea mare, iar in acel price range Nvidia nu prea existau. Si ma rog, pentru ca R7 265 face OC faorte bine.

Benchmark-urile de mai sus sunt pe Linux, AMD si pe DX e in urma cu driverele, pe Linux sunt praf, dupa cum se vede, dar altfel nu au relevanta. Eu unul ma asteptam la asta cand am trecut pe AMD, pana acum am avut macar bafta sa nu mai am probleme pe Windows.
"Screams of a billion murdered stars give life to the night's peace. While we cling in desperation to the few spinning stones we call worlds."

Image
User avatar
caleb
Pig Cop
Posts: 854
Joined: 25 Mar 2014, 17:03

Re: AMD vs nVidia vs Intel - benchmark(s) and stuff

Post by caleb »

Teoretic acum GTX 960 e cam cea mai ok variantă cu adevărat performantă, cel puțin asta concluzionez eu din grafic. Momentan nu mă împinge nimic să schimb 660 ti (care e cam același lucru -5/-8%) fiindcă nu țin ubermax sau rezoluții peste 1080p și asta duce lejer cam tot ce-i dau să ronțăie, dar dacă ar trebui să mă orientez, probabil asta ar fi soluția. Față de 750 Ti, performanța e cu peste 60% mai mare (ajunge și dublu pe alocuri), iar prețul e cam cu 50% mai mare (900 vs 600 în medie). Problema e că diferența aia de performanță înseamnă în raport direct 30+ FPS unde 750Ti are 20, exact diferența între jucabil și nejucabil :(

Eu unul aș lua 660Ti second mai degrabă decât 950 sau 750Ti nou, e aproape la fel de ok ca 960 și găsești la 5-600 de lei, de multe ori încă în garanție vreun an... Nici n-am prea văzut picate, a fost o serie fiabilă.
Last edited by caleb on 27 Oct 2015, 12:10, edited 3 times in total.
Post Reply

Return to “Hardware”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests