Lucruri interesante
- ola small dickie
- Big Daddy
- Posts: 14577
- Joined: 2 Mar 2014, 19:57
- Location: Malta
Re: Lucruri interesante
Deci macar sunt bune la ceva
Re: Lucruri interesante
Deci morala e ca trebuie sa evoluam in asa fel incat sa dispara nevoia de relatii cu altii
Re: Lucruri interesante
Asta nu o sa se intample vreodata decat daca cei singuratici reusesc cumva sa faca mai multi copii ca restu.
- DarthZombie
- Dremora Lord
- Posts: 4183
- Joined: 2 Mar 2014, 15:25
Re: Lucruri interesante
Nu ai nicio sansa a unei evolutii naturale in acest sens cata vreme ea este contrara interesului biologic de perpetuare a speciei.
Re: Lucruri interesante
"Interes biologic". Nu mai antropomorfizaţ.
Nu exista nici un imperativ biologic, nici o forta evolutionara. Agh, simt ca mi se umfla aceeasi vena in cap ca si atunci cand il ascultam pe Javik in Mass Effect 3.
Confundati rezultatul unui proces cu procesul insasi.
(old pet peeve, nu ma bagati in seama)
Nu exista nici un imperativ biologic, nici o forta evolutionara. Agh, simt ca mi se umfla aceeasi vena in cap ca si atunci cand il ascultam pe Javik in Mass Effect 3.
Confundati rezultatul unui proces cu procesul insasi.
(old pet peeve, nu ma bagati in seama)
- DarthZombie
- Dremora Lord
- Posts: 4183
- Joined: 2 Mar 2014, 15:25
Re: Lucruri interesante
Pai succesul oricarei fiinte biologice de la aparitia primei celule a fost determinat de abilitatea sa de a supravietui si a se reproduce, fara astea doua lucruri te alaturi imensei suite de specii disparute. Iar in afara reproducerii asexuate, orice trasatura care incurajeaza singuratatea nu are cum sa apara in mod natural din cauza violarii acestui principiu. Nu de alta dar aia care-si obtin dorinta de a fi perpetuu singuri nu se inmultesc, asadar ce gene or avea care ii imping catre aceasta directie mor odata cu ei.
Re: Lucruri interesante
Ah nu, eram de acord cu tine, mai ales ca mi se pare ca ai repetat ce am zis cu 2 posturi inaintea ta.
Just a minor nitpick on the choice of language used. E la nivel de nitpick cu "soarele rasare". Soarele nu rasare, noi ne invartim.
Daca ar fi vorba de un interes (si nu e), nu e interesul speciei, ci al genei (dar nu e), de a se perpetua. (chiar nu e).
Pentru cine are timp si chef: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intragenomic_conflict
Just a minor nitpick on the choice of language used. E la nivel de nitpick cu "soarele rasare". Soarele nu rasare, noi ne invartim.
Daca ar fi vorba de un interes (si nu e), nu e interesul speciei, ci al genei (dar nu e), de a se perpetua. (chiar nu e).
Pentru cine are timp si chef: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intragenomic_conflict
The classic example is segregation distorter genes that cheat during meiosis or gametogenesis and end up in more than half of the functional gametes. These genes can persist in a population even when their transmission results in reduced fertility. Egbert Leigh compared the genome to "a parliament of genes: each acts in its own self-interest, but if its acts hurt the others, they will combine together to suppress it" to explain the relative low occurrence of intragenomic conflict
Re: Lucruri interesante
phpBB [media]
Every machine is a smoke machine if you operate it wrong enough.
Full-time quote-happy-tagger.
Full-time quote-happy-tagger.
Re: Lucruri interesante
"da" - chestrony, 2016
- Ferrrrrrrrrdinand
- al IX-lea
- Posts: 3303
- Joined: 18 Sep 2016, 22:09
Re: Lucruri interesante
Apropo de toata discutia cu gillette
- Ferrrrrrrrrdinand
- al IX-lea
- Posts: 3303
- Joined: 18 Sep 2016, 22:09
Re: Lucruri interesante
Ce misto arata
- ola small dickie
- Big Daddy
- Posts: 14577
- Joined: 2 Mar 2014, 19:57
- Location: Malta
Re: Lucruri interesante
Photographer Spends Years Capturing Poignant Portraits of Animals on the Brink of Extinction
https://mymodernmet.com/tim-flach-endan ... r0dqPSlZnQ
https://mymodernmet.com/tim-flach-endan ... r0dqPSlZnQ
- Ferrrrrrrrrdinand
- al IX-lea
- Posts: 3303
- Joined: 18 Sep 2016, 22:09
- Ferrrrrrrrrdinand
- al IX-lea
- Posts: 3303
- Joined: 18 Sep 2016, 22:09
Re: Lucruri interesante
Is There Any Point to Protesting?
History provides an especially sharp rejoinder to those who doubt the sustained power of protest: the civil-rights movement. From the mid-fifties to the mid-sixties, activists successfully worked to roll back school segregation, public-transit segregation, interstate-bus segregation, restaurant segregation, poll taxes, employment discrimination, and more. It happened, piece by piece, under politically entrenched and physically threatening conditions. Its efficacy was virtually unmatched in our national past. The civil-rights movement preceded the protest meteor of the late sixties, but, for a new generation eager for change, it showed what was possible by taking to the streets.
Tufekci describes weeks of careful planning behind the yearlong Montgomery bus boycott, in 1955. That spring, a black fifteen-year-old named Claudette Colvin refused to give up her seat on a bus and was arrested. Today, though, relatively few people have heard of Claudette Colvin. Why? Drawing on an account by Jo Ann Robinson, Tufekci tells of the Montgomery N.A.A.C.P.’s shrewd process of auditioning icons. “Each time after an arrest on the bus system, organizations in Montgomery discussed whether this was the case around which to launch a campaign,” she writes. “They decided to keep waiting until the right moment with the right person.” Eventually, they found their star: an upstanding, middle-aged movement stalwart who could withstand a barrage of media scrutiny. This was Rosa Parks.
- Ferrrrrrrrrdinand
- al IX-lea
- Posts: 3303
- Joined: 18 Sep 2016, 22:09
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests