Forum LEVEL

As a matter of fact, any organization that takes up some sort of morally principled position is excused of its totalitarian functioning (a functioning inherent to the profit making system of capitalism). We saw this when the travel ban came into effect where in a previous piece I have written that: “It seems that they [Anti-Trumpers] are willing to accept the endorsement of companies that have dodged taxes, used sweat shops, have questionable privacy policies, cause fluctuations in labour and rent markets, and have even been complicit in causing the biggest economic meltdown of our lifetime. This all goes without mentioning the fact that corporations depend on the public image to create revenue and therefore have it in their best interest to manipulate their image.”

This entrenchment on the side of an exploiter that will only support a social direction as long as it is beneficial to its bottom line at a given time, aka the business case, is scarcely representative of a thought out political stance and is also worthy of being attacked as dogmatic (although for reasons very different than the memo writer will have us believe). The dogmatism here lies in the largely US relevant historic context of affirmative action which has transformed into a moral barometer

Further proof of this dogmatism reveals itself when we look closer at the “business case” for diversity which, according to the Financial Times, is the general agreement that “Teams of mixed gender, ethnicity, physical ability, age and sexual orientation are more representative of customers. They offer a variety of viewpoints and a wider range of experience, which improves decision-making and problem-solving.”

Pretty much this means that the only reason diversity is viable is because of the differences based on gender, ethnicity, etc. That is there is an implicit acknowledgment that these differences exist and it because of them and the representation of a greater group through the individual (employee/customer segment) that diversity provides a sensible business pursuit. That is, if these differences didn’t exist, there would be no need for greater inclusion or diversity on business teams.

DOLIU Ziua când România a devenit oficial STAT INFRACȚIONAL subordonat PSD!

ALARMĂ! Au ÎNGROPAT Justiția! Președintele EXCLUS! Procurorii de caz, la mâna noilor șefi puși de PENALI! Se înființează DNA-ul pentru procurori și judecători!

Reactie extrem de dura a lui Klaus Iohannis: Propunerile ministrului Justitiei sunt "un atac asupra statului de drept, independentei si bunei functionari a Justitiei, precum si impotriva luptei anticoruptie"

prim drojdierul României wrote:"Manualul de sport... Toată lumea l-a criticat pe domnul ministru Liviu Pop pentru el. Domnul ministru a fost mai delicat și nu a spus că el a fost obligat să-l facă, fiindcă așa l-a pus cineva în program anul trecut, când niște băieți mai tehnocrați un pic au spus că ne trebuie manual de sport"

2doze wrote:Iaaaaa, eu imi iau baniiiii in manaaaa, n-am caaaaaard, nu le daaaau un leeeeu comisiiionnnnn!!!!

„În ianuarie, înainte să plece (Guvernul Cioloș - n.r.), în ultimele zile, toată zona respectivă a declarat-o arie protejată natural și a trimis hârtiile pe la UNESCO. Adică în traducere «nu mai sapi o gropiță acolo nici să sapi după râme, că e arie protejată» (...) Vom încerca să retragem, să scriem că nu ne mai menținem punctul de vedere (...) Acolo sunt zăcămintele noastre”, a spus Tudose. El a precizat că nu știe care este argumentul pentru care Roșia Montană a fost declarată arie protejată.