Page 36 of 40
Re: Lucruri interesante
Posted: 20 Feb 2019, 17:52
by ola small dickie
Deci macar sunt bune la ceva
Re: Lucruri interesante
Posted: 20 Feb 2019, 21:00
by Mărar
Re: Lucruri interesante
Posted: 20 Feb 2019, 21:22
by cg1700
Deci morala e ca trebuie sa evoluam in asa fel incat sa dispara nevoia de relatii cu altii
Re: Lucruri interesante
Posted: 20 Feb 2019, 21:23
by Mărar
Asta nu o sa se intample vreodata decat daca cei singuratici reusesc cumva sa faca mai multi copii ca restu.
Re: Lucruri interesante
Posted: 20 Feb 2019, 21:24
by cg1700
Ce bine ca exista ingineria genetica
Re: Lucruri interesante
Posted: 20 Feb 2019, 21:55
by DarthZombie
Nu ai nicio sansa a unei evolutii naturale in acest sens cata vreme ea este contrara interesului biologic de perpetuare a speciei.
Re: Lucruri interesante
Posted: 20 Feb 2019, 22:02
by Mărar
"Interes biologic". Nu mai antropomorfizaţ.
Nu exista nici un imperativ biologic, nici o forta evolutionara. Agh, simt ca mi se umfla aceeasi vena in cap ca si atunci cand il ascultam pe Javik in Mass Effect 3.
Confundati rezultatul unui proces cu procesul insasi.
(old pet peeve, nu ma bagati in seama)
Re: Lucruri interesante
Posted: 20 Feb 2019, 22:30
by DarthZombie
Pai succesul oricarei fiinte biologice de la aparitia primei celule a fost determinat de abilitatea sa de a supravietui si a se reproduce, fara astea doua lucruri te alaturi imensei suite de specii disparute. Iar in afara reproducerii asexuate, orice trasatura care incurajeaza singuratatea nu are cum sa apara in mod natural din cauza violarii acestui principiu. Nu de alta dar aia care-si obtin dorinta de a fi perpetuu singuri nu se inmultesc, asadar ce gene or avea care ii imping catre aceasta directie mor odata cu ei.
Re: Lucruri interesante
Posted: 20 Feb 2019, 22:44
by Mărar
Ah nu, eram de acord cu tine, mai ales ca mi se pare ca ai repetat ce am zis cu 2 posturi inaintea ta.
Just a minor nitpick on the choice of language used. E la nivel de nitpick cu "soarele rasare". Soarele nu rasare, noi ne invartim.
Daca ar fi vorba de un interes (si nu e), nu e interesul speciei, ci al genei (dar nu e), de a se perpetua. (chiar nu e).
Pentru cine are timp si chef:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intragenomic_conflict
The classic example is segregation distorter genes that cheat during meiosis or gametogenesis and end up in more than half of the functional gametes. These genes can persist in a population even when their transmission results in reduced fertility. Egbert Leigh compared the genome to "a parliament of genes: each acts in its own self-interest, but if its acts hurt the others, they will combine together to suppress it" to explain the relative low occurrence of intragenomic conflict
Re: Lucruri interesante
Posted: 21 Feb 2019, 17:10
by Triggerix
Re: Lucruri interesante
Posted: 22 Feb 2019, 23:28
by ne0lith
N-am stiut exact unde sa postez, but this shit is great.
Re: Lucruri interesante
Posted: 23 Feb 2019, 20:03
by Ferrrrrrrrrdinand
Apropo de toata discutia cu gillette
Re: Lucruri interesante
Posted: 24 Feb 2019, 11:35
by Ferrrrrrrrrdinand
Re: Lucruri interesante
Posted: 26 Feb 2019, 07:46
by ola small dickie
Photographer Spends Years Capturing Poignant Portraits of Animals on the Brink of Extinction
https://mymodernmet.com/tim-flach-endan ... r0dqPSlZnQ
Re: Lucruri interesante
Posted: 2 Mar 2019, 18:08
by Azad
Re: Lucruri interesante
Posted: 5 Mar 2019, 22:43
by Azad
Re: Lucruri interesante
Posted: 8 Mar 2019, 00:41
by Ferrrrrrrrrdinand
Re: Lucruri interesante
Posted: 11 Mar 2019, 23:17
by Ferrrrrrrrrdinand
Is There Any Point to Protesting?
History provides an especially sharp rejoinder to those who doubt the sustained power of protest: the civil-rights movement. From the mid-fifties to the mid-sixties, activists successfully worked to roll back school segregation, public-transit segregation, interstate-bus segregation, restaurant segregation, poll taxes, employment discrimination, and more. It happened, piece by piece, under politically entrenched and physically threatening conditions. Its efficacy was virtually unmatched in our national past. The civil-rights movement preceded the protest meteor of the late sixties, but, for a new generation eager for change, it showed what was possible by taking to the streets.
Tufekci describes weeks of careful planning behind the yearlong Montgomery bus boycott, in 1955. That spring, a black fifteen-year-old named Claudette Colvin refused to give up her seat on a bus and was arrested. Today, though, relatively few people have heard of Claudette Colvin. Why? Drawing on an account by Jo Ann Robinson, Tufekci tells of the Montgomery N.A.A.C.P.’s shrewd process of auditioning icons. “Each time after an arrest on the bus system, organizations in Montgomery discussed whether this was the case around which to launch a campaign,” she writes. “They decided to keep waiting until the right moment with the right person.” Eventually, they found their star: an upstanding, middle-aged movement stalwart who could withstand a barrage of media scrutiny. This was Rosa Parks.
Re: Lucruri interesante
Posted: 24 Mar 2019, 11:15
by Stokkolm
Re: Lucruri interesante
Posted: 26 Mar 2019, 13:48
by Ferrrrrrrrrdinand