Stiinta

Locul in care ne intalnim si discutam de dimineata pana seara
User avatar
Mărar
Electro-Chemist
Posts: 2410
Joined: 2 Mar 2014, 14:08

Re: Stiinta

Post by Mărar »

Ma oftic putin ca nu exista un transcript, as vrea sa recitesc cateva bucati din conversatie / sa le am la indemana.

phpBB [video]

What's the difference between making a decision, and predicting what decision an agent would make if it were in your situation?
The brain is busy predicting the next set of patterns on the thalamus, and many of the patterns on the thalamus are generated by the brain itself[...] and by modeling this, it will make a model of itself as a control system. This is what our mind is doing; it's learning to observe it's own interaction with the world and tell a story about it, and we live inside that story.

We as conscious agents are not inside the physical universe, but are inside the story of the brain about itself and the interaction with the world. There is no reason why a system like GPT-3, with some extensions will not be able to do that.
Si mindfuck-ul episodului pentru mine
My own understanding of causality is that it's an artifact not of the world itself, but of the way we describe the world in certain context. The universe might best be understood as an unified state vector, that progresses from state to state according to the laws of physics.

At the level of this unified model where everything is connected to everything in a way you don't have causality, causality only emerges when you separate the world into things.

Because we cannot observe or measure the entire universe all at once, there is no hope that we will be able to model the universe as a unified state progression, so what we do is take out parts of the universe and treat them as separate objects, and these are all described by their own state space and their own transition function that moves them in the state space.
Edit: Ah, si asta
- [...]For instance religions often asks you to accept a certain creed that no random person on the street would logically accept, and the reason for that is that it makes you recognizable to your own group

- Because you don't want to end up on the wrong side of a spear

- Of course, and you also want to know that you can trust that other person, even though you don't know him directly. The difficulty in building a civilization is, how do you get over the Dunbar number ? How can you relate to strangers in a particular way and ensure they are serving the same purpose as you do? One of the best ways is to signal your allegiance with certain codes, that basically act as checksums that show the contents of your intellect and not randomly generated, but a result of a particular indoctrination that makes you likely do share the following preferences in sharing resources and making decisions
User avatar
Iavo
Pig Cop
Posts: 518
Joined: 8 Apr 2016, 11:17

Re: Stiinta

Post by Iavo »

Heh, nu dibuisem discutia asta pana acum. O sa o ascult maine.
User avatar
Stokkolm
Dremora Lord
Posts: 2555
Joined: 3 Mar 2014, 22:28

Re: Stiinta

Post by Stokkolm »

Researchers identify a new personality construct that describes the tendency to see oneself as a victim

Ha! You can't make this shit up. Libtards owned by facts and science!
User avatar
Mărar
Electro-Chemist
Posts: 2410
Joined: 2 Mar 2014, 14:08

Re: Stiinta

Post by Mărar »

Am pus intrebarea pe Discord acum ceva vreme
ca o paranteza, vad in continu pe ytube recomandri cu video-uri in formatul "watch Shapiro OWN this lib" "watch this feminist get destroyed by Peterson", "watch this muslim get fuckin in the ass by Harris", dar pentru recomandarile astora mai de stanga; Zizek / Chomsky, toate titlurile par... normale la cap "Chomsky on US imperialism" "Zizek on sniffing"

de ce-s astia de dreapta asa sensibili?

/insecure?
User avatar
Stokkolm
Dremora Lord
Posts: 2555
Joined: 3 Mar 2014, 22:28

Re: Stiinta

Post by Stokkolm »

No idea, dar la fel as fi pus si eu titluri la video-uri cand aveam 13 ani.
User avatar
bionicron
Space Invader
Posts: 22
Joined: 11 Mar 2014, 13:13
Contact:

Re: Stiinta

Post by bionicron »

DJT: "You're all victims here"
0:20 -- 0:45
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hok1HWQX0gU
User avatar
Waaagh!
Forum Warlord
Posts: 5233
Joined: 2 Mar 2014, 16:23

Re: Stiinta

Post by Waaagh! »

opa
Traces of a Mysterious Particle Predicted Decades Ago May Have Been Detected
The X-ray emission coming off a collection of neutron stars known as the Magnificent Seven is so excessive that it could be coming from axions, a long-predicted kind of particle, forged in the dense cores of these dead objects, scientists have demonstrated.
NO COVER. ALL MAN.
User avatar
Fular
Barbugiu înrăit
Posts: 1377
Joined: 14 Mar 2014, 23:13

Re: Stiinta

Post by Fular »

Spoiler for prima imagine a particulelor:
Image
EpicTroll: Vrei să ştii părerea mea? Oamenii cu păreri ar trebui degrabă împărţiţi la zero.
User avatar
Waaagh!
Forum Warlord
Posts: 5233
Joined: 2 Mar 2014, 16:23

Re: Stiinta

Post by Waaagh! »

hăhă

Aia si e semnificatia simbolică a numelui. Tipul care a propus particula a numit-o dupa brandul de detergent, ca-i stergea problemele ca buretele'n grasime.
NO COVER. ALL MAN.
User avatar
Fular
Barbugiu înrăit
Posts: 1377
Joined: 14 Mar 2014, 23:13

Re: Stiinta

Post by Fular »

pana mea, era ori asta ori o referință la Hellpoint, acel Dark Souls în spațiu.
EpicTroll: Vrei să ştii părerea mea? Oamenii cu păreri ar trebui degrabă împărţiţi la zero.
User avatar
Mărar
Electro-Chemist
Posts: 2410
Joined: 2 Mar 2014, 14:08

Re: Stiinta

Post by Mărar »

Stokkolm wrote: 10 Dec 2020, 18:23 No idea, dar la fel as fi pus si eu titluri la video-uri cand aveam 13 ani.
Dar... ai zis ceva similar cand ai postat linkul. Erai ironic sau...?


‘Why Me?’ The Role of Perceived Victimhood in American Politics

Those exhibiting higher levels of egocentric victimhood are more likely to have voted for, and continue to support, Donald Trump. However, those who exhibit systemic victimhood are less supportive and were less likely to vote for Trump in 2016. Perceived victimhood also relates to attitudes about a host of racial policies and racial resentment, reflecting the belief that others benefit disproportionately or unjustly at the victim’s expense. Finally, using an experiment with two different types of treatments, we find that both manifestations of victimhood are manipulable, including by elite messages. The sum of our evidence indicates that feelings of victimhood exist in the mass public, can be mobilized by political elites, and can potentially influence support for specific policies and candidates.
both egocentric and systemic victimhood increase as a result of hearing Trump or Biden describe the average people’s inability to catch a break. As noted above, this type of rhetoric is commonplace in political messaging (e.g., Horwitz 2018; Rucker 2019). Importantly, we control for factors that relate to actual political victimization—income, education, race, and sex. As such, we can conclude that the treatment vignettes—and, presumably, real world elite rhetoric—can promote self-defined victimhood, without regard for sociopolitical or legal victim status. This is precisely what our theory purports: Political elites can rhetorically weaponize victimhood, and actually instill these feelings in individuals (regardless of whether victim status is “earned” or “deserved”).
Modern right-wing rhetoric, for instance, decries liberal “snowflakes,” “safe spaces,” and political correctness culture. In each of these instances, victimhood is projected onto others. This mobilizes the projectors because the “victims” are illegitimate—they are not deserving of victim status in the eyes of those doing the projecting.
User avatar
Mărar
Electro-Chemist
Posts: 2410
Joined: 2 Mar 2014, 14:08

Re: Stiinta

Post by Mărar »

phpBB [video]

Webinar with Robert Sapolsky, the John A. and Cynthia Fry Gunn Professor of biology, neurology and neurosurgery at Stanford University, a research associate at the Institute for Primate Research in Kenya, and the author of Behave: The Biology of Humans at Our Best and Worst
User avatar
Mărar
Electro-Chemist
Posts: 2410
Joined: 2 Mar 2014, 14:08

Re: Stiinta

Post by Mărar »

phpBB [video]

In this episode, Robert Sapolsky, Ph.D., discusses the widespread impact of stress on our physical and emotional health as well as the mechanisms by which it can precipitate chronic illness, dementia, depression, and more. He also provides insight into the factors that contribute to the stress response (and our ability to handle it) such as social rank, personality, environment, and genetics. Lastly, we discuss how our behavior is altered in the face of stress and how that not only has a pervasive effect on a personal level, but also on society as a whole in how we interact with each other.

We discuss:
-Background, interest in stress, and Robert’s time in Kenya studying baboons [7:00​];
-Physiology of a stress response, and why it’s ingrained in our DNA [14:00​];
-Individual variation in the response to stress, and how everyone has a different optimal level [24:00​];
-How social rank and personality differences affect our stress response [30:15​];
-What’s happening in the brain when faced with stressful situations? [39:15​];
-What makes the human brain different than all other species? [48:15​];
-Imprinting stress to your kids epigenetically [52:00​];
-The role of stress on memory and the consequences of hypercortisolemia [57:15​];
-The impact of subjective socioeconomic status and social media on stress levels and health [1:01:45​];
-Tips for managing stress in the modern world [1:17:45​];
-What Robert learned about himself studying the social behavior of baboons [1:29:30​];
-The multilayered factors behind every human behavior, the context of “good and bad”, and exploring the human capacity of the wild extremes of violence and altruism from moment to moment [1:34:30​];
-PMS: How two women with identical hormone levels can have completely different emotional experiences [1:39:00​];
-How much of a role do genes play in depression and other emotional states? [1:42:45​];
-Why is cortisol elevated under sleep deprivation? [1:50:15​];
-The impact of stress on cancer [1:54:30​];
-The impact of stress on atherosclerosis, dementia, addiction, and depression [2:01:15​];
-Impulsiveness, impaired judgement, and lack of empathy in times of stress [2:05:45​];
-What advice would Robert give his 25-year-old self? [2:12:45​]; and
-More.
Se cam suprapune cu ce zice in Behave, deci daca ati citit cartea (da, tu, Iavo) nu cred ca are rost urmarit podcastul, pentru toti ceilalti, e o discutia interesanta care condensa multe din ideile prezentate in carte, iar Peter Attia e o gazda buna si pune intrebari pertinente. Desi incep sa ma tem ca pe partea de informatii medicale m-am cam hranit cu circlejerk-ul dintre Rhonda Patrick, Peter Attia si David Sinclair, via Ferris / Rogan.
User avatar
Mărar
Electro-Chemist
Posts: 2410
Joined: 2 Mar 2014, 14:08

Re: Stiinta

Post by Mărar »

phpBB [video]


I love this channel
User avatar
Mărar
Electro-Chemist
Posts: 2410
Joined: 2 Mar 2014, 14:08

Re: Stiinta

Post by Mărar »

Human penises are shrinking because of pollution, warns scientist
She discovered that male human babies who had been exposed to the phthalates in the womb had a shorter anogenital distance - something that correlated with penile volume.
Phathalates mimic the hormone oestrogen and thus disrupt the natural production of hormones in the human body, which researchers have linked to interference in sexual development in infants and behaviours in adults.
One study published in 2017 found that sperm levels among men in Western countries had dropped by more than 50% over the past four decades after examining 185 studies involving close to 45,000 healthy men.

Dr Swan believes that the rapidly decreasing fertility rate means that most men will be unable to produce viable sperm by 2045.
Poate ca natura chiar are sisteme de aparare :lol:

Urmeaza sa fim atacati cu mind worms.


later edit: pentru ca nu ai penis? https://giphy.com/gifs/owned-kYsBThMhhalLG
User avatar
Waaagh!
Forum Warlord
Posts: 5233
Joined: 2 Mar 2014, 16:23

Re: Stiinta

Post by Waaagh! »

Ce bine ca n-am problema asta hehe.

Edit: pentru ca e mare hehe.
Last edited by Waaagh! on 24 Mar 2021, 18:04, edited 1 time in total.
NO COVER. ALL MAN.
User avatar
Fular
Barbugiu înrăit
Posts: 1377
Joined: 14 Mar 2014, 23:13

Re: Stiinta

Post by Fular »

Asta merge pe aceiași albie a lui: it's not the boat that counts, it's the motion of the ocean, care deja era scuză de oameni cu cucul mic.
De obicei nu e așa. E de la poluare, ți-o jur.
EpicTroll: Vrei să ştii părerea mea? Oamenii cu păreri ar trebui degrabă împărţiţi la zero.
Post Reply

Return to “Cafenea”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests