Page 1 of 2
AMD vs nVidia vs Intel - benchmark(s) and stuff
Posted: 12 Jun 2014, 02:26
by zme-ul
Re: AMD vs nVidia vs Intel - benchmark(s) and stuff
Posted: 13 Jul 2014, 13:11
by zme-ul
Re: AMD vs nVidia vs Intel - benchmark(s) and stuff
Posted: 14 Jul 2014, 17:19
by zme-ul
Re: AMD vs nVidia vs Intel - benchmark(s) and stuff
Posted: 4 Sep 2014, 22:23
by zme-ul
Battlefield 4 Dragon's Teeth - Technology Analysis and benchmarks, DirectX 11 and Mantle
pe scurt: 2Gb VRAM pt Mantle nu e de ajuns
le:
chestia asta m-a facut curios, asa ca am rulat StarSwarm in DX cat si Mantle - 1080p, setari extreme
DX: 1506MB VRAM folosit
Mantle: 2152MB VRAM folosit
nota: 280Xu cu care am testat are 3Gb VRAM
Re: AMD vs nVidia vs Intel - benchmark(s) and stuff
Posted: 7 Sep 2014, 13:37
by zme-ul
Re: AMD vs nVidia vs Intel - benchmark(s) and stuff
Posted: 10 Sep 2014, 23:20
by zme-ul
Re: AMD vs nVidia vs Intel - benchmark(s) and stuff
Posted: 19 Sep 2014, 00:19
by zme-ul
Re: AMD vs nVidia vs Intel - benchmark(s) and stuff
Posted: 19 Sep 2014, 11:48
by zme-ul
Re: AMD vs nVidia vs Intel - benchmark(s) and stuff
Posted: 25 Sep 2014, 22:28
by zme-ul
Re: AMD vs nVidia vs Intel - benchmark(s) and stuff
Posted: 2 Jun 2015, 13:59
by zme-ul
Re: AMD vs nVidia vs Intel - benchmark(s) and stuff
Posted: 24 Jun 2015, 18:17
by zme-ul
AMD a lansat oficial AMD Radeon R9 Fury X

si cateva reviewuri:
consensul general e ca Fury X e sub, sau cel mult la acelasi nivel, cu GTX980Ti pentru exact acelasi pret (MSRP) si un consum ceva mai mare

Re: AMD vs nVidia vs Intel - benchmark(s) and stuff
Posted: 10 Jul 2015, 21:36
by zme-ul
AMD a lansat oficial R9 Fury (racite cu aer)
review:
http://anandtech.com/show/9421/the-amd- ... phire-asus ASUS + Sapphire
AMD si-au cam tras un sut singuri in cur pentru ca R9 Fury e ~100$ mai ieftina decat Fury X si nu trebuie sa-ti bati capul cu racirea cu lichid
Re: AMD vs nVidia vs Intel - benchmark(s) and stuff
Posted: 25 Oct 2015, 04:31
by zme-ul
22-Way Comparison Of NVIDIA & AMD Graphics Cards On SteamOS For Steam Linux Gaming
With Steam Machines set to begin shipping next month and SteamOS beginning to interest more gamers as an alternative to Windows for building a living room gaming PC, in this article I've carried out a twenty-two graphics card comparison with various NVIDIA GeForce and AMD Radeon GPUs while testing them on the Debian Linux-based SteamOS 2.0 "Brewmaster" operating system using a variety of Steam Linux games.
As it's been almost two years since running some SteamOS graphics benchmarks, it's certainly past due for running a new comparison with SteamOS in much better shape now for public appeal. I did a fresh install of SteamOS 2.0 Brewmaster on a test system (Core i7 5960X, Gigabyte X99, 16GB DDR4 RAM, 240GB OCZ SSD) and then proceeded to load the Phoronix Test Suite on it through the GNOME 3.14 based desktop environment that's hidden behind the default Big Picture Mode.
When pulling in some extra packages from the Debian Wheezy repository, it was possible to get the Phoronix Test Suite running fine on Brewmaster for offering automated benchmarks. In addition to looking at the raw performance results, the Phoronix Test Suite was simultaneously monitoring the GPU's core temperature as well (exposed via the respective driver interfaces) as the overall AC system power draw (via a USB-based WattsUp Power meter). With the power information, the overall system power consumption was recorded for each system + graphics card as well as the factored performance-per-Watt. As another metric, there's also performance-per-dollar benchmark results for the graphics cards tested that you can still easily purchase new; the prices used were obtained from Amazon.com in the US for the particular graphics card model tested and for the reference graphics cards tested their MSRP was used.
...
The NVIDIA graphics cards tested for this SteamOS comparison included many new and old GPUs. There's every current Maxwell GPU model, several Kepler GPUs, and even some older Fermi cards for those curious how their old systems will work on SteamOS with these Linux games.
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti 1024MB
- Zotac NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 1024MB
- MSI NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 1024MB
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 2048MB
- eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 1024MB
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2048MB
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 2048MB
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 3072MB
- eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 2048MB
- eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 2048MB
- eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 4096MB
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 4096MB
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti 6144MB
- NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12288MB
...
So for the AMD side I was just left:
- Sapphire AMD Radeon HD 6570 512MB
- Sapphire AMD Radeon HD 6870 1024MB
- Sapphire AMD Radeon HD 6950 2048MB
- XFX AMD Radeon HD 7950 3072MB
- XFX AMD Radeon R9 285 2048MB
- XFX AMD Radeon R9 290 4096MB
- Sapphire AMD Radeon R9 Fury 4096MB

Re: AMD vs nVidia vs Intel - benchmark(s) and stuff
Posted: 25 Oct 2015, 10:50
by caleb
Plus că mai e şi alt raport, performanţă vs amprentă termică. Pentru cei care şi+ar face miniITX şi contează şi asta. Unde iar Radeon, din păcate, şi-o ia urât de la seria 9xx.
Re: AMD vs nVidia vs Intel - benchmark(s) and stuff
Posted: 26 Oct 2015, 22:56
by Doc
Hmm, sunt cam 5-6 milioane pe Emag placile de top. Foarte util graficul, chiar urmeaza sa-mi schimb placa. Mii de multumiri

Re: AMD vs nVidia vs Intel - benchmark(s) and stuff
Posted: 27 Oct 2015, 07:23
by ola small dickie
GTX 750 am si eu.

de la evga. ce inspirat am fost
Re: AMD vs nVidia vs Intel - benchmark(s) and stuff
Posted: 27 Oct 2015, 07:41
by TG
Dacă nu folosești SteamOS, not really, în mod normal 750-ul fiind overpriced as fuck (dar potrivit ca o mănușă pentru Steam Machines). Rezultatele sunt după așteptări, AMD drivers ftw.

Re: AMD vs nVidia vs Intel - benchmark(s) and stuff
Posted: 27 Oct 2015, 07:51
by ola small dickie
Nu ma intereseaza steamos. Am dat 550 de lei pe ea anul trecut. E overpriced? Puteam sa-mi iau alta nvidia mai buna ca pret / calitate?
Re: AMD vs nVidia vs Intel - benchmark(s) and stuff
Posted: 27 Oct 2015, 11:17
by TG
Ideea e ca 750 e o placa video destul de slaba ca performanta, dar extrem de eficienta. Se adreseaza mai mult celor cu configuratii mai vechi sau surse slabe, 750 TI-ul e o varianta cu ceva mai mult oompf, dar din nou, ca performanta/pret nu e avantajoasa.
Depinde ce gaseai pe stoc si de unde ai cumparat. In principiu, cu 150-200 de lei in plus puteai lua un 660 GTX care era mult mai performant. Ca pret, da, e overpriced, in seriile vechi (6, 5, 4) cu 550 de lei primeai mai multa performanta relativ la jocurile de atunci. Eu de exemplu mi-am luat 460 GTX cu 650 de lei. Deci in categoria de mijloc, preturile au crescut dar nu datorita performantei, ci eficientei (consum mic).
Si eu am avut o alegere similara de facut, intre 750 Ti si altceva, am trecut pe AMD pentru ca, cu toata antipatia si problemele ce le-am avut cu ei de-a lungul vremii, diferenta de performanta era pur si simplu prea mare, iar in acel price range Nvidia nu prea existau. Si ma rog, pentru ca R7 265 face OC faorte bine.
Benchmark-urile de mai sus sunt pe Linux, AMD si pe DX e in urma cu driverele, pe Linux sunt praf, dupa cum se vede, dar altfel nu au relevanta. Eu unul ma asteptam la asta cand am trecut pe AMD, pana acum am avut macar bafta sa nu mai am probleme pe Windows.
Re: AMD vs nVidia vs Intel - benchmark(s) and stuff
Posted: 27 Oct 2015, 12:00
by caleb
Teoretic acum GTX 960 e cam cea mai ok variantă cu adevărat performantă, cel puțin asta concluzionez eu din grafic. Momentan nu mă împinge nimic să schimb 660 ti (care e cam același lucru -5/-8%) fiindcă nu țin ubermax sau rezoluții peste 1080p și asta duce
lejer cam tot ce-i dau să ronțăie, dar dacă ar trebui să mă orientez, probabil asta ar fi soluția. Față de 750 Ti, performanța e cu peste 60% mai mare (ajunge și dublu pe alocuri), iar prețul e cam cu 50% mai mare (900 vs 600 în medie). Problema e că diferența aia de performanță înseamnă în raport direct 30+ FPS unde 750Ti are 20, exact diferența între jucabil și nejucabil
Eu unul aș lua 660Ti second mai degrabă decât 950 sau 750Ti nou, e aproape la fel de ok ca 960 și găsești la 5-600 de lei, de multe ori încă în garanție vreun an... Nici n-am prea văzut picate, a fost o serie fiabilă.