Jocuri vechi și noi · Forumul comunității LEVEL
https://forum.candaparerevista.ro/
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/deta ... inmfbipjohSignificantly improves YouTube comments by replacing them with random herps and derps.
brutalistu » 8 Aug 2014, 23:12 wrote:Norton Antivirus free 24 h (or so)
http://sharewareonsale.com/s/norton-antivirus-sale
mercic, o sa=l testez acum pe latop sa vad ce-i de capu luiBefore we tell you how to get this freebie, please take note the terms and conditions of this specific giveaway dictate you must download, install, register, and activate before this offer is over.
Furthermore, please take note this freebie is really an extended trial of Norton AntiVirus 2014 instead of an actual license. In terms of features and protections, there are no differences between a trial and a real license — you get all the same features, updates, and protection. The difference arises in who can install it. If you have used Norton AntiVirus 2014 in the past, then you might not be able to install an extended trial and thus won’t be able to get this freebie. (If you haven’t used Norton AntiVirus 2014 in the past, then you can get this freebie.)
Portable Update is a windows-base tool for updating a Microsoft Windows computer in a isolated environment.
Tocmai am renunțat la multe din CD-urile mele audio, și ca parte a procesului de convertire în MP3 am folosit Sound Juicer, care caută metadatele pieselor în baza de date MusicBrainz (altfel nu ar avea de unde să știe decât „track1, track2...”). Foarte fain că le descoperă instantaneu. Totuși o parte din CD-uri nu erau catalogate, așa că am început să contribui - treabă care mi-a halit mult prea mult timp (și ar tot continua dacă m-aș lăsa dus de perfecționism și aș duce până la capăt legăturile între release > track > recording > performers > etc). Interfața web e foarte ineficientă din unele puncte de vedere, dar oricum, a fost interesant. MusicBrainz e raiul colecționarilorMărar wrote: ↑27 Mar 2014, 16:28 http://musicbrainz.org/doc/MusicBrainz_Picard
Pentru organizarea tag-urilor MP3/FLAC/etc si batch file rename, face lookup la baza lor de date si in 95% din cazuri gaseste matchuri fara nici o problema. Must have pentru fisiere cu missing tags sau cu tag-uri in alfabete non-latine (face conversie automata). Nu stiu cum m-as fi descurcat fara programul asta.
Așa este, pentru piesele care merită probabil voi genera FLAC-uri de acum încolo.
Mersi. Foobar2000 nu e liber, dar repo-ul Debian conține o mulțime de programe pentru așa ceva.Mărar wrote: ↑25 Aug 2022, 22:56 Pe langa musicBrainz, foobar2000 are niste capabilitati de tag / rename destul de puternice, practic poti sa iei orice bucata de filename/tag si sa-l folosesti in alta parte. Foarte util cand ai convertit deja mii de piese si te-ai trezit ca nu-ti mai place formatul
%tracknumber%. %artist% - %title% si preferi %tracknumber% - %artist% - %title%. Sau cand ce ai nu gasesti pe muzicbrainz dar totusi fisierele sunt tagate intr-un mod rudimentar sau au o oarecare structura folderele.
2005-02-04 02:35:20
What parts of Foobar are not open source, and what is the reason for this?
The SDK is there to allow people to add whatever features they want. If there is something they can't add with what the SDK provides, then either it requires changes breaking component compatibility (which only I could do even if the source was open), or person trying to implement the feature is doing something seriously wrong (happens very often).
With a few remarkable exceptions (foo_ui_columns is one of them), I'm generally disappointed with what third party developers do with the SDK. Quite surprising that no one has even made a stable and fully functional skinned UI replacement by now. Even some of popular components made by people I know (*cough* foo_shuffle) are broken to the point where I have to consider reimplementing them myself just to resolve crashes people report. I don't see how sourcecode release would help with that. Additionally, multiple branches would introduce even more mess, since even now people new to foobar2000 download a lot of third-party components only to get stability issues along with not-really-important features.
As for porting to different OSes, sourcecode release won't magically spawn people capable of doing that properly. Somehow no one has written fully functional foobar2000 clone yet.
Sourcecode loss argument is not really valid, I keep backups on multiple redundant devices. I'd be surprised if someone who spent as much time on programming as I have wouldn't know well enough how to handle this.
Uninteresting.
Da, să zicem. N-am să detaliez acum de ce "open source" e o șubrezire a ideilor despre softul liber.
Argumentele lui sunt cu totul pe lângă. Totuși apreciez că SDK-ul e liber.