Reality: WW3 cu sua

My companies make great products that people love and I’ve never physically hurt anyone.
So why the hate and violence against me?
Because I am a deadly threat to the woke mind parasite and the humans it controls.
U.S. national-security leaders included me in a group chat about upcoming military strikes in Yemen. I didn’t think it could be real. Then the bombs started falling.
The world found out shortly before 2 p.m. eastern time on March 15 that the United States was bombing Houthi targets across Yemen.
I, however, knew two hours before the first bombs exploded that the attack might be coming. The reason I knew this is that Pete Hegseth, the secretary of defense, had texted me the war plan at 11:44 a.m. The plan included precise information about weapons packages, targets, and timing.
On Tuesday, March 11, I received a connection request on Signal from a user identified as Michael Waltz.
Two days later—Thursday—at 4:28 p.m., I received a notice that I was to be included in a Signal chat group. It was called the “Houthi PC small group.”
A message to the group, from “Michael Waltz,” read as follows: “Team – establishing a principles [sic] group for coordination on Houthis, particularly for over the next 72 hours. My deputy Alex Wong is pulling together a tiger team at deputies/agency Chief of Staff level following up from the meeting in the Sit Room this morning for action items and will be sending that out later this evening.”
The message continued, “Pls provide the best staff POC from your team for us to coordinate with over the next couple days and over the weekend. Thx.”
At this point, a fascinating policy discussion commenced. The account labeled “JD Vance” responded at 8:16: “Team, I am out for the day doing an economic event in Michigan. But I think we are making a mistake.” (Vance was indeed in Michigan that day.) The Vance account goes on to state, “3 percent of US trade runs through the suez. 40 percent of European trade does. There is a real risk that the public doesn’t understand this or why it’s necessary. The strongest reason to do this is, as POTUS said, to send a message.”
“I am not sure the president is aware how inconsistent this is with his message on Europe right now. There’s a further risk that we see a moderate to severe spike in oil prices. I am willing to support the consensus of the team and keep these concerns to myself. But there is a strong argument for delaying this a month, doing the messaging work on why this matters, seeing where the economy is, etc.”
A few minutes later, the “Michael Waltz” account posted a lengthy note about trade figures, and the limited capabilities of European navies. “Whether it’s now or several weeks from now, it will have to be the United States that reopens these shipping lanes. Per the president’s request we are working with DOD and State to determine how to compile the cost associated and levy them on the Europeans.”
At 11:44 a.m., the account labeled “Pete Hegseth” posted in Signal a “TEAM UPDATE.” I will not quote from this update, or from certain other subsequent texts. What I will say, in order to illustrate the shocking recklessness of this Signal conversation, is that the Hegseth post contained operational details of forthcoming strikes on Yemen, including information about targets, weapons the U.S. would be deploying, and attack sequencing.
The only person to reply to the update from Hegseth was the person identified as the vice president. “I will say a prayer for victory,” Vance wrote. (Two other users subsequently added prayer emoji.)
According to the lengthy Hegseth text, the first detonations in Yemen would be felt two hours hence, at 1:45 p.m. eastern time. So I waited in my car in a supermarket parking lot. If this Signal chat was real, I reasoned, Houthi targets would soon be bombed. At about 1:55, I checked X and searched Yemen. Explosions were then being heard across Sanaa, the capital city.
The Signal chat group, I concluded, was almost certainly real. Having come to this realization, one that seemed nearly impossible only hours before, I removed myself from the Signal group
Earlier today, I emailed Waltz and sent him a message on his Signal account. I also wrote to Pete Hegseth, John Ratcliffe, Tulsi Gabbard, and other officials.
Brian Hughes, the spokesman for the National Security Council, responded two hours later, confirming the veracity of the Signal group. “This appears to be an authentic message chain, and we are reviewing how an inadvertent number was added to the chain,” Hughes wrote. “The thread is a demonstration of the deep and thoughtful policy coordination between senior officials. The ongoing success of the Houthi operation demonstrates that there were no threats to troops or national security.”
There was another potential problem: Waltz set some of the messages in the Signal group to disappear after one week, and some after four. That raises questions about whether the officials may have violated federal records law: Text messages about official acts are considered records that should be preserved.
Stiu baieti din crangasi cu OPSEC mai bun decat ratatii astiaAll along, members of the Signal group were aware of the need for secrecy and operations security. In his text detailing aspects of the forthcoming attack on Houthi targets, Hegseth wrote to the group—which, at the time, included me—“We are currently clean on OPSEC.”
Potrivit deputaților ruși conduși de Piskarev, în cadrul evenimentului organizat în Parlamentul României, „s-au făcut apeluri repetate către țările occidentale, inclusiv din partea agenților străini, pentru a realiza înfrângerea militară a Rusiei și a o dezmembra în multe state independente”.
În plus, a adăugat Piskarev, au existat propuneri de „scoatere a Rusiei din Marea Neagră”, care „conțin elemente de crime exprimate în apeluri publice pentru acțiuni care vizează încălcarea integrității teritoriale a Federației Ruse și în apeluri publice pentru declanșarea unui război agresiv”.
Piskarev pare să facă referire la al 15-lea Forum al Națiunilor Libere din Post-Rusia – Marea Neagră: Frontiera Viitorului pentru o Europă Sigură și Stabilă, eveniment despre care această organizație susține pe site-ul său că a avut loc la Palatul Parlamentului în data de 19 martie.
O nebunie într-adevăr. Ca și reacțiile maga de după. Gaslighting la maximum.Mărar wrote: 24 Mar 2025, 22:49 The Trump Administration Accidentally Texted Me Its War Plans
Am pus mai jos ce mi s-a parut mai notabil, dar e nebunie articolul
Stiu baieti din crangasi cu OPSEC mai bun decat ratatii astia![]()
[25/03/2025 2:56 pm]
eu simt ca am invatat multe
[25/03/2025 2:57 pm]
mereu m-am intrebat
[25/03/2025 2:57 pm]
daca se prefac sau nu
[25/03/2025 2:57 pm]
they really are this retarded
da, interesant. nu schimba ca tarifele sunt in fapt pus pumnul in gura, plus ca unde dai si unde crapa.. totodata, baiatul ignora si celelalte zeci de crize si incercari de reforma financiara esuate din secolul XX de parca Breton-Woods si abandonarea standardului de aur au fost singurele puncte de cotitura.
Users browsing this forum: Semrush [Bot] and 3 guests