Presedintele american Donald Trump a afirmat joi ca omologul sau mexican Enrique Pena Nieto ar trebui sa-si anuleze vizita pe care urmeaza sa o faca la Washington, daca Mexicul refuza sa plateasca pentru constructia zidului de la frontiera, relateaza Reuters.
[...] One of the countries with whom we have a large trade deficit is . . . Mexico. The U.S. trade deficit in goods with Mexico was $60.7 billion in 2015 and is expected to be around $65 billion in 2016. So if Mexican imports are taxed at a rate of 20 percent, the United States would raise about $13 billion a year in revenue from Mexico via the border adjustment.
How much will the wall cost? Trump has put the price at between $8 billion and $12 billion. Others have suggested it could be higher, between $15 billion and $25 billion. Either way, the full cost would be more than covered in one or two years by the $13 billion in annual revenues we would collect from Mexico. Indeed, over several years, the border adjustment could force Mexico to pay not only for the wall, but for the costs of a lot of Trump’s other border-security measures — from expediting the deportation of criminal aliens to hiring more screeners to conduct “extreme vetting.”
In other words, the border adjustment would allow Trump to keep two major campaign promises at once — he could tax imports and subsidize exports, while forcing Mexico to pay for the wall.
And here is the really brilliant part: There is nothing Mexico could do about it.
White House spokesman: Trump calling for 20 percent tax on imports from Mexico to pay for southern border wall - The Associated Press
am o mare problema cu chestia astaIn other words, the border adjustment would allow Trump to keep two major campaign promises at once — he could tax imports and subsidize exports, while forcing Mexico to pay for the wall.
calitatea produselor or sa scada si pentru ceea ce plateau 1$ (sa zicem), vor plati 1.5-2$vulp wrote:cetateanul american plateste la fel de mult (eventual mai putin, din motive populiste).
da, asta e clar, odata ce pui limitari de acest gen, calitatea produselor o sa scada. dar asta nu o sa atraga de la sine cresterea consumului... cel mult o crestere indirecta in cheltuieli de sanatate, servicii (reparatii etc). aceste schimbari indirecte, insa, sunt fix ceea ce economistii de dreapta prefera. deci e cam win-win (adica win extern + win intern, joburi, reciclarea banilor, stabilizarea inflatiei) din punct de vedere al economiei politice. chiar daca e naspa.zme-ul wrote:calitatea produselor or sa scada si pentru ceea ce plateau 1$ (sa zicem), vor plati 1.5-2$vulp wrote:cetateanul american plateste la fel de mult (eventual mai putin, din motive populiste).
economia americana de abia si-ar putea permite un zid pe granita cu Mexiul, dar economia mexicana duduie in asa incat sunt perfect capabili sa-l plateasca
nu erau destui straini rapiti din strada in Mexic pana acum? ia sa vezi de acum in colo - sezon deschis la americani
Tu esti pe bune? Lasand la o parte artistii deveniti peste noapte experti in politica? Pe bune? Trebuie sa fii expert in politica ca sa ti se para abominabila ideea ca America construeiste un zid la granita cu Mexic? Eu nu stiu pe ce planeta mai traim anymore.Apollyon wrote:Lasand putin la o parte artistii deveniti peste noapte experti in politica, uite un articol care explica cum poate Trump sa forteze Mexic sa plateasca pentru zid:
Am inteles ca te referi la postarea lui Robert Holmes. Si? Trebuie sa fii expert politic ca sa-ti dai seama ca:Apollyon wrote:Ma refeream postarea de pe facebook a lui Robert Holmes care ironiza ideea ca vecinii o sa plateasca pentru zidul lui Trump.
Unde am zis eu ca e o idee geniala? Am postat un articol care explica cum SUA ar putea, daca ar vrea, sa forteze Mexic sa plateasca pentru zid. Nu inteleg de ce atata indignare.
zidul lui Trump e frectie la picior de lemnvulp wrote:...
tare Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 8 guests
