Medieval II: Total War

Discuții axate pe jocurile de tactică și strategie.
Post Reply
User avatar
Vlad Dracul
Zergling
Posts: 167
Joined: 2 Mar 2014, 16:39

Medieval II: Total War

Post by Vlad Dracul »

Pentru că-n anu’ ăsta se împlinesc exact două decenii de la lansarea jocului (aniversarea-i în noiembrie, da’ io am zis să iau hora-nainte, ca oltenii :mrgreen: ) și am observat cu surprindere că nu există un topic pe forum despre Medieval II Total War (da, știu că numele oficial e invers, da’ sună ca dracu’, e mai bine M2TW imo), am luat o anumită decizie ale cărei consecințe se vor vedea aci, pe parcursul anului.

Adică dacă tot e vorba de ”După 20 de ani”, mă voi transforma într-un fel de Alexandre Dumas și voi continua uraganul de vorbe cu a cărui dezlănțuire v-am obișnuit în postările despre SnowRunner (sau Formulă), făcând ceva schimbări ce-i drept pentru că deh, Evu’ Mediu, da’ nu extrem de multe, conform principiului ”Lupu-și schimbă păru’, da’ năravu’ ba”.
Așa că voi fi lupu’ vostru medieval (The Howling Wolf of Transylvania :lol: ) p-ici-șa, în majoritatea timpului unul mai leneșache care doar se autocitează și-și copy+paste-uiește scrierile mai vechi publicate de-a lungul timpului și de-a latul internetului, dar chiar și-așa, anumite vorbe trebuie spuse ca să rămână și aci, nici măcar nu contează în care dintre limbile Pământului.

Medieval II Total War e în fruntea listei mele de pe Steam în privința orelor jucate, am peste 3.000 acolo și tare mi-e teamă că acea cantitate deja uriașă nu reprezintă decât jumătate de adevăr, cre’ că mai am încă pe-atâtea petrecute cu varianta de pe discuri a jocului.
Deși m-am apucat târziu de el, prin noiembrie 2012 la 6 ani de la lansare (o cam am pe asta, să nu mă înghesui să încerc jocuri noi, pentru că din păcate sunt puse pe piață incomplet finisate, pline de bug-uri și tot felul de erori extrem de enervante, ori eu joc ca să mă distrez și relaxez, chiar dacă iau de multe ori foarte în serios ce fac prin lumea virtuală) și nu m-a încântat mai deloc la început (deh, când standardul de excelență se numește Heroes of Might and Magic III e greu ca oricare alt TBS să se afirme), dar pe măsură ce-i descifram tainele a început să mă captiveze din ce în ce mai mult, și-am ajuns la vorba aia cu ”Pofta vine mâncând”. Și-am mâncat pe săturate, ca un refugiat somalez într-o țară bogată din Vest.

TD;DR: L-am jucat în draci. Insist să povestesc.

:lol:

În această ”mutare de deschidere” am să mă limitez (vorba vine, io-s Unlimited când e vorba de zis chestii, n-am măsură) la a enumera părțile bune și rele ale Medievalului, în opinia mea.

Încep cu lucrurile bune, evident că punctul de atracție pentru mine a fost că se referă la istoria medievală, iar eu fiind un mare iubitor de strategie medievală... the rest is history.

Bătăliile.
Cum în SnowRunner grafica e punctul forte al jocului, în Medieval bătăliile sunt Dumniezo pi Pamânt, absolut magnifice, cele mai bune bătălii pe care le-am întâlnit vreodată într-un joc pe computer. Factorul de realism și imersiune e și el mare, în afară de câteva bug-uri și ceva probleme cu pathfinding-ul unităților, n-am nimic de reproșat. Iar pomenitele erori sunt mai degrabă minore, nu reprezintă vreun deal-breaker.

Faptul că pot să joc cu Cavalerii mei Teutoni, atât în varianta vanilla (ca unități speciale ale Sfântului Imperiu Roman de Națiune Germană), cât și în expansiunea Kingdoms.
Și că în sfârșit există un joc în care să fie reprezentați corect, ca unități de cavalerie, nu o infanterie care de-abia se târăște pe hartă, cum apar prin alte jocuri contrazicând în mod imbecil atât adevărul istoric cât și însăși definiția unui cavaler.

Discursurile pe care comandantul armatei tale le ține înainte de bătălie.
Maaaaan, I’m gonna miss those things dearly, dezaxații ăștia de woke-iști n-o să îndrăznească în vecii-vecilor să facă așa ceva în Medieval III, deși era o idee ce trebuia dezvoltată în continuare și dusă pe noi culmi.
Absolut savuroase, deloc politically-correct but completely historical accurate.
Surprind perfect spiritul epocii respective, pe vremea când bărbații erau bărbați, nu curcubei pizdificați.

Echilibrul din faza inițială a jocului.
Deși AI-ul trișează cu nerușinare, totuși la început ai o șansă reală ca, în funcție de cunoștințele de strategie deținute și priceperea în a conduce o oaste, să obții niște victorii eroice (în anumite circumstanţe poţi câştiga o bătălie în care eşti depăşit numeric şi valoric chiar de 4 ori) și să-ți salvezi cetățile asediate.

E foarte fain că ai opțiunea de a continua o campanie chiar și după ce îndeplinești condițiile necesare pentru victorie, la fel și-n cazul în care le ratezi, adică poți juca nu neapărat la nesfârșit, dar pe-aproape, adică până când elimini toate celelalte facțiuni din joc sau îți pierzi toate teritoriile.

Prezența provinciilor rebele.
Asta înseamnă că te poți extinde fără a fi în război cu alte facțiuni. La fel de adevărat că dacă cucerești anumite provincii, acele facțiuni care le-ar fi dorit pentru ele încep să te dușmănească pe ascuns și-ți vor declara război, mai devreme sau mai târziu. Indiferent dacă-s aliați cu tine și dacă relațiile între statele voastre sunt (teoretic) bune.

Faptul că HRE (The Holy Roman Empire, Imperiul pomenit mai sus) are culoarea neagră pe hartă, arată într-un mare fel și se și potrivește perfect.
Evident că-i facțiunea mea favorită din vanilla.

Ai posibilitatea de a ”șlefui” prinții și generalii, dându-le ocazia de a dobândi unele ”atribute” (traits) prin acționarea anumitor mecanici ale jocului ca de exemplu construcția anumitor clădiri sau setarea nivelului taxelor în timp ce ei sunt guvernanți acolo, trimiterea lor în cruciade sau jihaduri, atacarea armatelor inamice doar dacă ai superioritate sau inferioritate numerică etc.

Existența unor ”games inside the game”, precum ‘războaiele’ dintre negustori, controlul asupra Colegiului Cardinalilor și manipularea alegerilor papale (dacă ești catolic, evident), alianțele prin căsătorie, la fel ca și păstrarea purității sângelui regal.
Lucrurile astea conferă Medievalului o foarte plăcută profunzime.

Poți unelti ca un oraș al altei facțiuni să se răscoale și să devină rebel, dacă infiltrezi o grămadă de spioni acolo și sabotezi cu asasini clădirile care fac populația locală fericită.

Până și faptul că în loc ca doar să apeși pe un buton și să apară un meniu diplomatic, trebuie să-l trimiți pe respectivul diplomat pe tărâmuri străine să negocieze cu celelalte facțiuni, asta dând o însemnată tușă realistă jocului. Bineînțeles că nu-mi convine că durează o veșnicie până când omul meu străbate distanța dintre Cairo și Edinburgh sau dintre Cordoba și Novgorod dar... chiar așa se petreceau lucrurile în realitate în vremurile alea – călătorii lungi prin ținuturi primejdioase pentru a îndeplini sarcina trasată.

Posibilitatea construirii forturilor, chestia asta poate fi folosită strategic pentru a bloca anumite trecători din munți, a întârzia înaintarea inamicului și a-i distrage atenția de la ținta reală.

Trebuie să pomenesc și muzica din timpul bătăliilor, foarte atmosferică.


Trecând la lucrurile rele, astea din păcate nu-s deloc puține. Mi-aș fi dorit fierbinte să fie altfel, dar...

Harta prea mică, cu prea puține provincii și prea puține facțiuni.
Knights of Honor (alt joc de strategie medievală, dar RTS) care apăruse cu 2 ani mai devreme ca M2TW avea parcă vreo 170 de provincii și vreo 40 de facțiuni, dacă nu mă înșel.
E adevărat că au încercat cei de la Creative Assembly să mai dreagă lucrurile prin lansarea unei expansiuni în anul imediat următor, dar totuși, too little, too late.
Personal îmi doream să joc cu Ordinul Teuton pe întreaga hartă a Europei, nu doar în jurul Mării Baltice.

O bună parte din nord-vestul Europei lipsește, de exemplu Islanda și cea mai mare parte a Scandinaviei, iar asta-i o mare nedreptate făcută vikingilor, cei care au descoperit America cu vreo juma’ de veac înaintea lui Columb.
Iar dacă există Danemarca, la fel ar trebui să existe și Norvegia, cel puțin.

Americile-s poziționate greșit. Da, înțeleg de ce, dar totuși puteau găsi un alt artificiu prin care să le așeze la locul lor.

Aliații jucătorului care-și declară război doar la șto, ca să-i scufunde reputația gușterului uman. Semnează pace curând dup-aia.
Oricum, facțiunile AI-ului nu se prea războiesc serios între ele, chiar dacă dpdv militar au potenţa de a cuceri vreun teritoriu sau a distruge vreo armată, n-o fac. În primele 100 de ture nicio facţiune nu e distrusă (rarele excepţii fiind scoţienii sau turcii – în situaţii speciale) în afara celor eliminate de jucătorul uman.
Iar asta-i de-a dreptul de absolut tot căcatul, parcă era Total War, nu? Sau e ”All vs. the Human Player”?

Ca regulă generală, AI-ul se comportă de parcă unicul său scop ar fi să-ţi distrugă plăcerea de a juca, nu să obțină vreun succes decisiv.

Agenții AI-ului care aterizează în capul alor tăi, obligându-i să se mute de pe ”pătrățelul” ocupat și pierzându-și astfel ”ghidajul” către destinație. Dacă nu ești atent și nu-i redirecționezi când îți vine rândul la mutare, rămân acolo până mor de bătrânețe. Și prostie.

Pe câmpul de bătălie ai câteodată senzația că unitățile AI-ului se mișcă nejustificat mai repede decât ale tale, arcașii lor sunt mai iuți de picior decât arcașii tăi, speamen-ii lor mai rapizi decât ai tăi etc. cavaleria mea de-abia poate prinde din urmă niște țărani hămesiți care fug de mama focului din fața măcelului, iar așa ceva e chiar absurd.

Diplomația care-i programată în mod pervers, întotdeauna există o șansă ca unul dintre aliații tăi să te atace din senin, fără motiv și fără vreun avertisment (deși există posibilitatea de a-ți da un fel de ultimatum), iar chestia asta poate transforma jocul într-un Total Nightmare pentru jucătorii nou-veniți.

Modul în care AI-ul trișează cu maximă nerușinare, scoțând armate din cur deși-i complet falit (adică nu poate plăti nici măcar un singur florin pentru recrutare și solda militarilor, că n-are de unde) iar tu ești la porțile ultimului său castel/oraș.

Același AI care joacă fără ”Fog of war”, poate vedea fiecare mișcare pe care o faci.

Felul în care spionii și asasinii eșuează mizerabil și mor, în ciuda faptului că aveau șanse de reușită de 95%, la fel ca spionii care nu reușesc să deschidă porțile cetăților inamice deși sunt creditați cu 97% șanse.

Nivelul maxim de dificultate ar trebui să fie very hard, dar de fapt e doar very annoying pentru că-i very overcheating.

Granițele trasate greșit și numele provinciilor inexacte dpdv istoric, doar două exemple – în Evul Mediu capitala Țării Românești era la Târgoviște, nu la București, iar a Moldovei la Suceava, nu la Iași.
Mă seacă la suflet chestia asta, au comis-o la fel și-n Knights of Honor II. Zău că-i lipsă de respect, e chiar atât de greu să dai dreaq un search pă Goagăl...?!

Grafică mizerabilă.
Măscăricii ăștia au interpretat la propriu sintagma Dark Age, incredibil.
Doar pentru că, la figurat vorbind, Evul mediu timpuriu a reprezentat o perioadă întunecată în istoria omenirii (din cauză de lipsă de suficiente izvoare documentare, băi boilor care-ați făcut de-a-n pulea jocu’ și habar n-aveți de ce-i zice ”Dark Age”! ’r-ați ai dreaq dă boii dreaq! :lol: Nu că ar citi ăia, da’ citiți voi și tre’ să vă aduc la cunoștință faptul că ăia au fost niște imbecili analfabeți acu’ 20 de ani), nu înseamnă că tre’ să ne măcelărească ochii cu maroul ăla jegos plus un gri de-a dreptul ceaușist pus pe harta întregii Europe. Până și HoMM III are grafică mai bună, zău așa. Nu mai vorbesc de primul Knights of Honor...

Ah, apropo, cu o chestie au încercat să pară șmecheri dar au picat de fraieri, n-au păstrat anumite proporții decente între oameni și orașe/castele (cum e în Heroes cu eroii și castelele), ci au încercat să reproducă modul în care erau reprezentate chestiile respective în epocă (adică oamenii mari și așezările umane mici).
Ghici ce, e de-a dreptul caricatural, de absolut tot căcatu’, au eșuat mai mult decât lamentabil.

Atributele caracterelor care se anulează câteodată unele pe altele. Cum dreaq să fii în același timp antialcoolic și bețiv...?!

Faptul că nu poți alege cine moștenește coroana ci e atribuită arbitrar de joc, câteodată sărind, vorba Paraziților, ca bolile din... mă rog.

Inevitabilele bug-uri prezente în jocuri. Aci nu-s multe, dar sunt câteva.

Însă cu adevărat cel mai rău lucru legat de M II TW e reprezentat de uriașul potențial irosit, dacă ar fi fost făcut ca lumea din toate punctele de vedere, ar fi fost considerat unul dintre cele mai bune 3 jocuri create vreodată, și chiar nu exagerez cu afirmația asta.

Dar chiar și așa, rămâne un joc bun care oferă o cantitate semnificativă de satisfacție, odată ce înveți să navighezi printre ’icebergurile’ reprezentate de părțile nasoale necorectate de cei de la Creative Assembly.

Deus lo vult!

Image
User avatar
sleepknot
Headless Kamikaze
Posts: 319
Joined: 26 Nov 2019, 17:44

Re: Medieval II: Total War

Post by sleepknot »

Am jucat stupid de mult M2:TW. Tin minte si acum campanii hot-seat cu Alfonso al Spaniei jucate prin camin, sau incercari repetate de a rezista pe very hard cu regatul pagan al Lituaniei impotriva rusilor si a teutonilor.

Good times. Jocul are si azi niste moduri excelente; recomand Broken Crescent sau deja clasicul Stainless Steel overhaul. Din zona fantasy, M2 are si un mod foarte reusit de LotR pentru Total War

Recomand cu caldura si Medieval kingdoms 1212 pentru Atilla:TW. E cea mai apropiata chestie de Medieval 3 pana acum
"Where there are no gods, there are ghosts" - Novalis
User avatar
Vlad Dracul
Zergling
Posts: 167
Joined: 2 Mar 2014, 16:39

Re: Medieval II: Total War

Post by Vlad Dracul »

Da, comunitatea de modderi din M2TW e foarte numeroasă, de multe ori făcând treaba pe care cei de la CA trebuiau s-o facă în privința anumitor aspecte ale jocului.
Iar existența unor mod-uri foarte ofertante a făcut ca Medieval II să fie unul dintre cele mai jucate și comentate jocuri din seria Total War chiar și-n ziua de azi, la decenii distanță de la lansare.

Personal, n-am încercat încă niciun mod dar întotdeauna am fost tentat de faimosul Stainless Steel precum și de Tsardoms, creația unei echipe în care erau parcă și ceva români, o minunăție vizuală la care sper să fi rezolvat toate problemele din trecut ce duceau la ‘crășuirea’ jocului.


În altă ordine de idei, în continuarea istorisirilor mele am să copy+paste-uiesc pe-aci cele mai relevante postări despre gameplay-ul din vanilla pe care le-am făcut de-a lungul timpului pe forumul ’principal’ al Medievalului, Total War Center. Nu le mai traduc pentru că mi-ar lua foarte mult timp, în plus nu cred că-i cazul, sunt convins că cei interesați de M II TW înțeleg limba engleză cel puțin la același nivel ca mine (care-am învățat-o singur, din filme și muzică, n-am făcut nici măcar o oră la școală).

Și-am să încep cu...


Guidelines for new and inexperienced players (but not only)


I decided to open this topic hoping that it will help new (or inexperienced) players, because I remember how hard this game can be when you’re trying it for the very first time and have no experience with other games from the Total War series.

I’ll try to be as short as possible, don’t want this post to be a tl;dr wall of text, but I have the strange impression it will end up quite massive because there are so many things to say, so your patience will be tested here.

If you want to master the game, you must understand it first.
When you’re starting your first campaign, your main goal should be rather to observe than to win.
Pay attention not only to game mechanics but also to AI behavior (which is overcheating anyway. Well, except that, notice its moves and its preferences).

From my point of view, there are certain guidelines that I recommend someone to follow in every single game on Vanilla:

FRIEND OR FOE
Don’t ask any advice during the campaign on the strategical map.
That female advisor knows nothing.
She’ll tell you to build the wrong buildings and recruit the wrong units all the time.
Just forget about her.
On the other hand, the military advisor can inform you about some interesting things during the battles. Pay attention to what he says but proceed as you think it’s best for you.

Sometimes I really ask myself if the Council of Nobles isn’t infested with enemy spies, so troublemaking are some missions they give me. Treat it with extreme caution, a bad mission failed doesn’t mean a loss, on the contrary.

USEFUL AND USELESS BUILDINGS
I made a topic with that name some while ago, I do recommend you to read it because it’s very important to know what to build and especially what not to build during the campaign.
And in what order, what you should build first and what can wait for later.

Also, if you want a certain Guild in a certain settlement, create all the specific agents only in that town (for example, you want the Theologians Guild in Milan? Recruit a priest/imam every single turn from that place) until the Guild offers its services. Plus constantly upgrade that particular building-chain, as it'll create more skilled agents (for example, from a Cathedral you can create bishops, which are better than priests. Same with their muslim counterparts).

Oh, and a crucial lesson I learned from the all-time greatest TBS game (Heroes of Might and Magic III): always be building. Every single turn.
Make sure you have the necessary funds to do it.

MANIPULATE THE DIPLOMACY
The diplomacy is crucial in this game, without a high reputation this game can quickly become a tragedy for the human player.

Unfortunately, the diplomacy is the weakest link of M2TW and a source of infinite frustrations for everybody, due to the fact that sometimes has nothing to do with any common sense or human-logic at all, so you better manipulate it in your advantage.

Although I didn’t believe it in the past, now I think it’s very important to ally as many factions as you can (at least 5). Ofc, avoid antagonistic alliances (like Venice and the Byzantines or England and France) and be prepared for some allies to declare war to each other (mostly only to sink your rep, they’ll cease fire quickly after).
I try to aim for 8 alliances in my short campaigns and at least 5 on my long campaigns but inevitably lose a couple along the way (especially in short campaigns).

The factions that are good allies according to my game-experience are the following: the Papal States (truth bein' told, this alliance is rather a necessity than a good alliance. You simply need to be allied with the Papal States, even if you’re a muslim faction. Especially if you’re a muslim faction, actually), Hungary (even if you’re Poland on long campaign, there can be peace and harmony between your factions), Denmark (even if you’re the Holy Roman Empire - long campaign, ofc. In the short campaign you must eliminate them), Spain/Portugal (there is a possibility for them to attack each other and you'll be forced to choose which alliance to keep. If you're lucky they might not, everything will run smooth - especially on short campaigns - and you won't be losing reputation for being forced to break an alliance) and the Turks.

Potential good allies could also be Venice (although they could start some trouble with Hungary or - later on - Papal States) and Russia (although a conflict with Denmark might occur).

The grey zone is formed by England, Scotland, France and Poland.
You could ally with one (or more) of them, short or medium term depending by the situation, under certain circumstances.

For example, it's hard to believe that you can be long-term ally with Hungary, Poland, Russia and Denmark at the same time and none of them to ever attack another.
However, there can be situations (like in one of my experiments with The Holy Roman Empire long campaign on Very Hard/Very Hard) in which after some fighting (Denmark with Poland, HRE with Poland, Denmark with Russia) things will settle down for a period of time (Poland bein’ vassal of HRE and Russia to Denmark, so HRE re-allied with all 4 of them). Longer or shorter, it remains to be seen.

Ofc, it all depends by what faction you’re playing with and the victory conditions.

I also think it’s important to know what factions you better avoid allying with. Imo those are Egypt (NEVER ally with Egypt. Ever. They always make the mistake of conquering Jerusalem and Antioch and the Pope wants to Crusade the living Jesus out of them! So Egypt will fight most of your allies all the time), Milan, Sicily, Moors, the Byzantines, HRE, the Mongols (actually, you can ally with the Mongols if you have Immaculate reputation, but they’ll betray you – if you’re in their path. The good news is you can “cash-milk” them, so you can use their treacherous behavior to fill your coffers), the Timurids (same as Mongols). Regarding Aztecs, if you're playin' long enough for them to appear, just do what the spanish did in real history. No offense, it's just business.

Another thing that’s worth to be mentioned here, you get better deals by negotiating with captains than with generals/family members or towns/castles.

PINCH THEIR CHUNK
In the beginning of the game when you start makin’ the usual diplomatic agreements (map info exchange, trade etc.) try to also ask very small sums of money (like 10 or 15 or even 20 florins), especially from factions that you know you won’t ally with them.

For example, if the Map Information exchange is regarded balanced, try to also ask 10 florins from them for that deal.

You might think it’s insignificant, well, theoretically it is but practically it could help quite a lot in the early stages of the game when finances are so tight.
There’s nothing more frustrating than missing just 3 florins when you want to start building something crucial right away (and that happened to me more than you’d think).

PUT THE SEAT BELT ON
Save the game a lot during the campaign; at the beginning of each turn, after reading all the messages (but before agreeing on marriage proposals or deciding to accept the Guild offers or picking between those allies that went to war only to ruin your reputation), save.
Have 4 or 5 saves for the current campaign and if it’s necessary, use all of them in one turn;

Before you move anything on the map, think. And after you took a good decision, save.

When in doubt, save as version 2 (or 3 or 4 or 5); always need a solid go-back point and that should be save no. 1, the one from the beginning of the current turn, which should be left untouched until next turn;
Before using important spies and assassins in missions, save; after they succeed, save; before an important battle - save; after a major success - save; before tryin' a merchant-acquisition, save; after... yeah, you guessed it right.
It’s not Total War, it’s Total Save Game. :lol:

Last save of the turn should be after you’ve done everything except retraining; there is a bug in the game that takes your money but doesn’t retrain your troops if you save after retraining, so always do it before.
Save -> retrain -> end turn.

LOVE AND MARRIAGE GO TOGETHER LIKE A HORSE AND CARRIAGE
Don’t rush to marry your princess, especially the one you got in the beginning of the game; it’s better to use her in diplomacy and even to forge an alliance through marriage. Those kind of alliances tend to be a little more stable than the regular ones.
Same with your heir, better save him for an exotic foreign princess.

IF YOU WANT BLOOD, YOU GOT IT
It’s a good idea to let allies room to expand, don’t be too greedy in your land grabbing, otherwise you risk bein’ attacked by those you considered your best friends.
Be aware that there are certain “trap-provinces” you better stay away from, except the situations you really want to go to war with the factions that want those lands as well (just some examples – Ajaccio, Cagliari, Tunis, Antwerp, Bruges, Dijon, Durazzo and Kiev. Or, if you’re muslim, Jerusalem and Antioch).

A faction can attack you regardless of your common religion, high reputation, alliance or relations-level, if you possess a territory that they want. And AI factions’ victory conditions are different than the ones set in the campaigns for the human player, they are oriented towards conquering certain provinces and hating certain factions. So, no matter what you do, if you get in their way you’ll be hated.

DON’T STEP ON THE BUG
A famous bug that makes occupying a settlement hurt your reputation more than if you sacked it.
This guy here provided a solution to that, and I also gotta add what Vampiresbane says here, in Chapter 10 Actual Point Values for Reputation and Relations under the Reputation spoiler ”you don't need to unpack M2TW to make this file work-just place it in the folder specified”.

But honestly speakin', occupyin' is counterproductive, you're much better with sackin' anyway.

KEEP THE FAITH
If you’re catholic, make sure the Pope is your friend, otherwise you’ll be in big trouble.
Create lots of priests and send them in territories with different faith than yours (but not on your allies’ lands, it can be considered a hostile act) so that they’ll raise piety faster and become cardinals; denouncing heretics and witches also can raise piety. Once a priest reaches 5 piety, it becomes eligible for the College of Cardinals. It's crucial to have as many guys in there as possible.
On a papal election, try to anticipate who has the best chances to win and vote for that particular preferati, but keep in mind that your goal is to put the pointy hat on one of your cardinals; if it gets to one of your allies it’s just as good (actually most of the times it's even better, if you have Perfect relations with that long-term ally).
Build churches, if the Pope demands that from you.
Join the Crusades when His Holiness calls them (but it's much better if you are the one that requests them, according to your strategic interests) and try to conquer the targets if they're at hand, this will give you great benefits; but God forbid to use the Crusade as an excuse to conquer Constantinople, it’ll end up extremely bad for you.
You can also manipulate the Pope (if your relations-level is high enough) by persuading him to call a Crusade against your excommunicated catholic enemy.

In case that you have a low-piety general and see an Inquisitor lurking around in that area, attach a priest to that general. The priest will be the one burned and the general will escape... for the time being.

If you’re muslim, you should also try to raise the piety of your imams; an imam with at least 4 piety can request a Jihad. Jihads (just like Crusades) can be used to add more movement to your armies, but make sure you move those armies to Jihad/Crusade target every turn, or else your men will start deserting.

If you’re orthodox, just keep the faith, there’s nothing else you can do.

Joking aside, Crusades and Jihads can be powerful tools that you should use as weapons, always in your advantage and against your enemies.

REBELS WITHOUT A CLUE
The rebels can be a curse but also a blessing. They negatively affect your province income and cause unrest, but on the other hand they also are great practice-targets to level up your spies, assassins and Dread generals. Plus, as well an income source almost every turn by selling your allies attacks against rebels. Use them wisely and if you can, try to push them just a little bit over the border, but not too far away from your towns producing spying/killing agents.
And if you can push them to a mountain pass, bridge or other narrow strategic point, they will „guard” that area for you. Well, that until they decide to move to another place so you better keep an eye on them. I also noticed that they seem very attracted by watchtowers, blocking the revealed area those towers provide.
You can spot the rebels location by that grey devastation area that they create around them over time.
Be careful though not to let your own men become rebels; if your faction leader has low authority (0 to 3 or 4) don’t send armies without a general in the open; Hell, don’t even send low loyalty (0-3) generals out of the settlements, there is a chance they’ll become deserters.

EQUILIBRIUM
In the beginning of the game don’t conquer too much too fast (if you’re a new player you probably need more time to learn how to blitz, anyway); other factions don’t see that with good eyes and you’ll be considered an aggressor-nation; even laying siege will have the same effect, just like you already took the settlement you’re sieging; as for starting a war with another nation, if it's no emergency it's better to wait until you have a positive reputation and some good allies;
Be very careful to keep the balance between your income and your army upkeep; don’t create more army than your economy can support, otherwise you’ll go into debt; Militia units, besides havin' decent fighting-skills, also have free upkeep as long as they’re garrisoned in towns that can produce them; keep that in mind and act accordingly; Mercenaries on the other hand are good soldiers with high upkeep so they should always be fighting - their place is on the front line, all the time;
Cities produce more income than castles; in order to have a balanced economy, you need to aim for a (at least) 3 to 1 towns/castles-ratio; once you have a certain number of provinces (like 10+), transform the unnecessary castles into towns.

TO TAX OR NOT TO TAX
That is the question. And the answer is – it depends by the situation but on the long term is better to keep your taxes at low in the beginning of your campaign.
The lower the tax-level is, the faster your population grows. More people = more money. And the towns grow too which brings more money also by allowing you to construct sooner those useful economical buildings.
So, what you lose on short term by lowering the taxes, you gain on long term. And gain even more.
After your towns get to 24.000 people, enough to reach the Huge City level, you can set them to high or very high, depending on the public order.

But there are certain situations when you desperately need cash and you need it right then and there. In those occasions you can temporary raise the tax level, just be careful not to provoke riots in towns.
And remember to bring them down again, once your emergency passed.

THERE’S MORE THAN ONE WAY TO SKIN A CAT
You can win a short campaign by eliminating certain factions and controlling a specified number of provinces.
First thing that comes to one’s mind when it comes to eliminate a faction is to take by force all their settlements; well, there are also other ways around that.
Some factions have the tendency to sell some provinces in exchange of a kinda limited amount of florins; better take advantage of this situation and buy as much land from them as you can; in several turns (like 5 or so) you can gain back the money you paid from those provinces’ income only. It’s a very good deal.
You should also seriously consider eliminating a faction by assassinating all their family members; or kill all of them on the battlefield.

KNIGHTS AND MERCHANTS
Merchants are pretty important in this game, they’re definitely worth having and using.
Explore the map to see where are the resources they can gain more money from and park them there until they level up.
After they gain enough finances (like 5-7), take a couple of them and go merchant-hunting! Try to acquire every low lvl AI-merchant (doesn’t matter if ally or not, you won’t get punish for this) in sight. You can make serious money that way.
Money you can use for the upkeep of your knights. With a serious army of knights, a determined man with military skills can achieve great deeds, methinks.
But be careful not to leave your low lvl mercs undefended, the AI will often try to take you out of business as well.
Important note: the AI will try to acquire your merchants only when they are on a resource. To avoid that, move them off and when the danger had pass put them back on. Be careful thought, the AI may return.

DON’T FEAR THE REAPER
Don’t be afraid to go the Dread path, I personally rather have an enemy who fears me (and will be likely to rout in the battle) than having a moral boost for my army (which is given anyway by a high-star general).
Ofc, that doesn’t mean it’s a good idea to execute prisoners and exterminate settlements, overwhelming the enemy on the battlefield (by simply bringing a larger army than his) does the trick just fine.
You don’t have to seek that path, just go along it when you have the chance.
I also noticed that if you assassinate a lot, your Faction Leader will have not only more dread but also more authority, which is always a good thing.

STRIKE DOWN THE SHEPHERD, AND THE SHEEP WILL BE SCATTERED
If you want to get rid of an enemy once and for all, don’t try to kill every single army that enemy has; it’s better to concentrate on his towns/castles.
Besides, the overcheating AI pulls armies out of thin air most of the time, but if you conquer all its settlements there’s nothing it can do.
Also, in battles try to kill the enemy general (or captain) first; it'll be much easier to make the rest of them rout afterwards.

SAY HELLO TO MY LIL’ FRIENDS
You probably noticed that unfortunately in this game allies are almost useless, didn’t you?
Well, the key word is almost.
While they don’t help you with anything (plus they sometimes betray you for no reason and without warning) you can still persuade them to give you a nice amount of florins. Ofc, in exchange of attacking rebels (most profitable deals) or other factions.
Gotta add that you can sell those attacks only to factions with whom you have at least Amiable relations, and doesn’t matter if they’re your allies or just neutrals.
Actually, in M2TW allies are not real allies, they’re truly just neutral factions good for nothing except cash-milking (plus raising your reputation) and that's exactly what you should use them for, remorseless.

I SPY (and occasionally assassinate, but hey, who are you to judge, „One man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter”, right? :twisted: )
Spies have their importance to the game, it’s always a good idea to see every single thing that’s movin’ within your kingdom, in all your neighbors' provinces and even beyond. Information is power, spotting in time an enemy army that approaches your borders can be a life-savior.
You need to be like Sauron, to see everything.
So, build some watchtowers and don’t neglect to place spies in strategical spots, revealing the map as much as possible.

Plus, you can assign some of them to counterintelligence, in order to protect your border-cities from enemy spies that cause unrest. If population happiness suddenly drops for no reason, there's only one logical explanation: a foreign spy is infiltrated there. So, send your own spy inside that city and wait for the secret agent to expose himself. He will, sooner or later.

Don’t forget about assassins either (that if you don’t insist on role-playing a chivalry ruler), it’s always useful to have a few max-skilled ones at hand. You never know who crosses your path at midnight on a dark alley. :evil:

During the game you can encounter a very annoying situation, you want a certain town but you can’t take it, either because it belongs to one of your allies or to a neutral faction that you simply don’t want to go to war with.
What can you do, what can you do...?!
Ofc, try to buy it, but if that fails there’s only one option left: „liberate” it from their current „oppressors”, so you can bring „democracy” there a little later.
Infiltrate shítloads of spies in that town/city. The more the merrier. Bring a horde of assassins along (plus a couple of priests) and sabotage every pop-happiness building from there. You can also try to kill generals/family members that are present, if the odds are favorable.
If you’re lucky that settlement will rebel, so keep an army nearby to start sieging it asap.
(Note that it’s not very effective for castles, they don’t rebel much)

If you’re not lucky, you’ll lose some assassins and that faction will even become upset with you and declare war, but there’s always the „erase and rewind” option. Simply reload the game and give it another try. If you don't succeed, do something different, save, reload and then try again.

AND WE ASK THE STRANGER NOT TO KILL US IN OUR BEDS TONIGHT FOR NO DAMN REASON AT ALL
If a faction declares war to you out of the blue (starts sieging or just blockades a port) and you think that a war would be unnecessary, don’t retaliate (especially if the attacking force is small, it’ll only decrease your relations with that faction, making negotiations harder); instead send a diplomat and see if they are willing to cease fire (that’s why it’s so important to have diplomats all over the map, so they can reach in a single turn every faction).
I noticed that most of the time the AI factions are just attention-whores and your Ceasefire offer is regarded more than generous; you can use that in your advantage to ask them to attack a faction or rebels (if you need to increase your reputation) or just ask some money (cash or regular tribute) or even land.

An obvious, common sense thing is never to attack an ally (no matter what stupid missions the Council of Nobles is giving you).
Let them have this "honor" of betraying (they love to do it anyway) and take a 2-3 levels reputation-hit.
If you want to get rid of an alliance (assuming that you simply need to conquer the lands your ally has and he refuses to sell them to you), it's best to put a diplomat to negotiate the end of it. Offer that faction a tribute (you'll automatically stop payin' it anyway when the war starts) plus attacks vs. rebels and one of their enemies and if they don't agree just make the declaration that you want to break the alliance, your reputation will suffer less (decreases just one level if you unilaterally break it).

DIRTY DEEDS DONE DIRT CHEAP
And some dirty tricks you can use: reloading the game when something goes wrong (assassination fails, merchant acquisition fails, spying fails etc.), the Crusade/Jihad experience trick and the running trick.

As you know, after a successful Jihad/Crusade all the units that participate to it gain one chevron of experience, no matter if they actually contributed to that achievement or not. How can you take advantage of that and give most of your armies that bonus? Well, by planning things ahead. You need to take in consideration that after a successful (or failed) Crusade/Jihad it takes 10 turns 'till you can start another, so you have plenty of time to prepare. The basic strategy is that you'd want to conquer your target in just one turn. So, start producin' spies asap and keep sending them to infiltrate the settlement you want to acquire. Also, move your generals that you like to get more chivalrous near the armies you want to upgrade, so when the moment is right to be able to "load" them. The army that will give the decisive blow should take a position from where it could reach the target in one turn. Once you have enough spies infiltrated, declare the Jihad/Crusade and in the next turn join it with all the generals and armies you want, and then immediately take the settlement.
And now you'll be the happy owner of a more experienced army with more chivalrous generals.

The running trick works when you have battle-time limit on, the enemy attacks and you’re hugely outnumbered (meaning, „No way in Hell I’m gonna win this, not 1 vs. 40!”).
All you have to do is run your general (but also your entire small army if your units are fast enough) away from your enemy forces (run from one corner to the other on the battlemap, clockwise or counterclockwise), so he won’t get killed until the time expires. The battle will be considered a win for you (small victory) and the enemy army will retreat.

Ofc, this doesn’t mean I encourage you to avoid fights all the time. You definitely need to learn how to crush your opponent square and fair on the battlefield. But there are certain moments when the overcheating AI simply needs to taste its own medicine.

:twisted:
Image
User avatar
Vlad Dracul
Zergling
Posts: 167
Joined: 2 Mar 2014, 16:39

Re: Medieval II: Total War

Post by Vlad Dracul »

Acu’ vreo 13 ani, după ce începusem să mă familiarizez cu jocu’, m-am apucat să cercetez anumite lucruri în amănunt încercând să dezleg toate tainele Medievalului, și astfel am ajuns la întrebarea ”Băi, da’ ’Attack faction X’ ce face concret, cum funcționează?” și, după ce-am căutat degeaba pă internet, am pus întrebarea în gura mare și pe forumul Total War Center.

Spre marea și neplăcuta mea surprindere, nimeni nu a fost capabil să-mi dea un răspuns mulțumitor, se părea că oamenii disecaseră în cele mai mici amănunte absolut toate aspectele jocului în postări lungi și alambicate (cam cum fac io p-aci :D ), mai puțin cele legate de funcția respectivă. Și asta la vreo 6-7 ani de la lansarea Medievalului!

Cum ar veni, cele mai luminate minți nu știau mai nimic despre o mecanică absolut crucială a jocului.

Așa că am pus personal mâna (strânsă de mânie într-un pumn de fier învelit într-o mănușă de catifea) și-am început o serie lungă de teste prin campaniile mele, teste ale căror rezultate au dus la o concluzie pe care-am publicat-o pe forumul respectiv, fiind primul din lume care a enunțat cu subiect și predicat cum stau lucrurile.

Nu, nu mă laud, mă descriu.

Fie vorba-ntre noi e mai mult dezamăgire în vorbele mele, mă așteptam ca, dacă tot m-am apucat așa târziu de joc, după atâția ani Medievalul să fie deja ”descifrat” complet, iar eu să vin, ca un leneșache, la ”de-a gata”, singura muncă să fie cea de cercetare, informare și verificare a ceea ce făcuseră alții demult.
Cum ar veni, să mă așez direct la masă în fața fripturii aburinde, nu să trebuiască să mă duc să vânez eu însumi căprioara cu pușca mea cea lungă, în pădurea de la strungă.

:lol:

Dar precum în viață în orice lucru rău e și unul bun, tot așa am învățat astfel o lecție absolut crucială – cum să manipulez diplomația.


How to manipulate diplomacy in M2TW


From my point of view the diplomacy represents the weakest link of this game, meaning that during a campaign it often lacks any form of elementary human logic or common sense. Allies attacking you for no reason and without warning, kingdoms on the verge of destruction that refuse an advantageous ceasefire offer, factions that gang up only against human player if that player has a low reputation but not on AI, even if AI is despicable etc. etc. you know what I’m talkin’ about, you lived this nightmare before for sure.
The reason is in the game scripts, which are quite pervert, I'm tellin' ya.

That was the bad news, the good news is that the diplomacy can (and should) be manipulated in your advantage.

By manipulating diplomacy one can mind his own business and concentrate on the campaign’s goals, rather than go wild goose-chasing fighting everybody everywhere.

Allies remain (well, more or less) allies, enemies are the ones the player picks, no unnecessary wars take place (almost). The player can decide who to fight and where, can actually work on a military and economical strategy.
Don’t have to bother with occupying every settlement or releasing every captured prisoner (which is very much counterproductive) in order to increase the global reputation.

The game gains the sanity that previously lacked. Doesn’t look like a mental institution anymore, but rather like something you can have fun while playing.

But enough foreplay, let’s cut to the chase:
As you definitely noticed in your game-experience, regarding Medieval II Total War, reputation is the key.
If you have high reputation, the game is enjoyable, otherwise it becomes something ugly and frustrating (especially for new players).
After a lot of struggle with the overcheating AI that made every effort almost every game to destroy my pleasure of playing, I finally found a way to easily increase my reputation to Immaculate on VH/VH (without manipulating diplomacy my highest rep level was Trustworthy on hard) and imho to get the best out of the Vanilla version of the game.

I always was curious about that “Attack faction” diplomatic option the game has and since nobody could give me a satisfying answer about how it works, I started testing it myself.

The results were quite shocking, turned out that if I offer to (let’s say) Denmark an attack against a faction (or rebels) and keep my word (really do attack), the reputation of Denmark rises.
And the other way around.
If you convince factions to attack rebels or other factions, your reputation will increase.

Logically speaking, it’s a nonsense, but it works.

So, by manipulating diplomacy that way I even managed to achieve a performance like reachin’ Immaculate reputation by turn 10 in one of my campaigns with HRE (on very hard).

Image

If you’re interested in this tactic, here’s how it should be done:

Diplomats are extremely important, so in the beginning of the game start creating as many of them as you can; use your first princess also in diplomacy.
If you don’t have any Town Halls, stray from your usual building-path and start creating one in the very first turn of the game.

Make alliances, as many as you can (well, not antagonistic ones) and as fast as you can; it’s better to have a couple of allies before conquering the first rebel settlements and at least 4 before starting a war with another faction. That’s because sackin’ settlements and ransomin' prisoners affects your reputation so you better take some countermeasures first. And also because it’s easier in the future to convince an ally to attack someone than to convince a neutral faction to do the same.

When you’re offering alliances, always ask for an attack against rebels in exchange; factions tend to agree easier to attack rebels in the beginning of the game; on later stages, you won’t convince them anymore to attack rebels, but other factions instead.
If they don’t agree, try to offer them money (usually a tribute, sometimes they ask themselves for that) or/and attacks against rebels, anything but determine them to attack.
If they’re still not convinced, just ally with them anyway and try again some turns later.

(Btw, you get better deals by negotiating with captains than with generals/family members or towns/castles)

As many successful deals you make, as much your diplomats’ influence rises, the relations with different factions also and after your reputation will be above Trustworthy, it will be easier and easier to get better deals in the future (even if they’re regarded as “demanding”).

When you’re Immaculate there’s no need to ask your allies to attack rebels/factions anymore, that is ‘till 2 of your allies will start a war. Then you’ll be forced to break an alliance which can lead to a rep drop. And that will lead you to ask your allies to attack factions once again.

And speakin’ about attackin’ factions, no matter how perfect are the relations between us I noticed that my allies are almost impossible to convince to attack my enemies (which could be very useful for me) and even a common enemy, but they tend to agree attacking some of their own enemies (not any enemy, only certain ones).

Instead I have no problems getting’ serious florins out of them when I offer attacks against rebels. Which I do quite often, beside the money it also helps the relations to go up.

Now, I’m not particular happy I have to defy logic that way in order to enjoy M2TW, and I can’t help myself from asking all kind of questions:

Why in the name of sweet Lord Jesus Christ would they be so ecstatic if I attack rebels on my territory?! Or a faction that they don’t care about, thousands miles away from their borders?! Why should my reputation go up if I convince my allies to attack their enemies located at the end of the world from my lands?!
What’s the tactical or strategical advantage for me or for them out of this mess?!
What kind of pervert logic this game is following?!

No clue, the answers are beyond me. All I know is that it works.

One last thing, I don’t pretend this to be some sort of ultimate diplomacy guide for M2TW;
I’m also not sure at all that it was CA’s intention that Medieval to be played this way;
I’m not even thrilled I have to act so out of logic for the game to behave mentally sane;
It’s just how things work for me best and I wrote this thinkin’ that other players will enjoy the game more by following my playstyle.

I’ll end this with some useful statistics:

Relations level

Abysmal
Terrible
Very Poor
Poor
So So
Reasonable
Amiable
Good
Very Good
Outstanding
Perfect


Reputation levels

Despicable
Deceitful
Very Untrustworthy
Untrustworthy
Dubious
Mixed
Reliable
Very Reliable
Trustworthy
Very trustworthy
Immaculate


Factions wealth

< 2,500 Bankrupt
< 7,500 Meagre
< 12,500 Very Poor
< 17,500 Poor
< 22,500 Modest
< 27,500 Reasonable
< 32,500 Well off
< 37,500 Rich
< 42,500 Very Rich
< 47,500 Extreme
> 47,500 Boundless
Image
Post Reply

Return to “Tactică și Strategie”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest